Spec URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.3.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Gabbi is a tool for running HTTP tests where requests and responses are represented in a declarative YAML-based form. Fedora Account System Username: chandankumar Successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10678999
Thank you for your review request. Please add a python3 package. Upstream also includes tests, please execute them as well during build.
Hi Chandan, Latest version on pypi is 1.5.1. The spec file should be pointing to that version, right?
1. URL should point to package pypi page 2. Do you need to disable pbr version determination mechanism on build? For example, https://github.com/openstack-packages/neutron/blob/4bc2d731766a50fb0d6733bbd8e0a2bde1f4a187/openstack-neutron.spec#L443
Hi, here's an updated spec/srpm: http://rsb.io/pkg/python-gabbi.spec http://rsb.io/pkg/python-gabbi-1.6.1-1.fc22.src.rpm I don't think the PBR mechanism needs disabling, but I'm not certain. I know you can add a patch that disables PBR entirely as a runtime dep, but I don't think it's required.
Hello Ryan, Sorry for the late reply. Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Thanks, Chandan Kumar
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/review/python-gabbi/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. There are no "Requires:" for any of the packages, which is likely a mistake as I know gabbi needs jsonpath. wsgi_intercept, etc to run. Please add runtime deps. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). See above [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-gabbi , python3-gabbi , python-gabbi-doc [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. I was only able to build this package against f24 rawhide, the "python-wsgi_intercept" did not install on f22 or f23. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. There is no %check section [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm python-gabbi-doc-1.7.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm python-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc24.src.rpm python2-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run python2-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires -------- python3-gabbi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python-gabbi-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python2-gabbi python2-gabbi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) Provides -------- python3-gabbi: python3-gabbi python-gabbi-doc: python-gabbi-doc python2-gabbi: python-gabbi python2-gabbi Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gabbi/gabbi-1.7.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 917258f3a32f199db4670fb11d9f2609fc6110e27fd9f6dd548d733f29bd6525 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 917258f3a32f199db4670fb11d9f2609fc6110e27fd9f6dd548d733f29bd6525 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec --name python-gabbi-1.7.0-1.fc24.src.rpm -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines - Dist tag is present. - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-ironic-python- agent See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack- ironic-python-agent/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [X]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2 -ironic-python-agent , python2-ironic-python-agent-doc [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [X]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.2.13 starting (python version = 3.4.2)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache Start: cleaning yum metadata Finish: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache Mock Version: 1.2.13 INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.13 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/python2-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/python2-ironic-python-agent-doc-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/yum-deprecated --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-22-x86_64/root/ --releasever 22 install /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/python2-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm /home/tenobreg/review-packages/1257329-openstack-ironic-python-agent/results/python2-ironic-python-agent-doc-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm python2-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm python2-ironic-python-agent-doc-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.src.rpm openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) deprovisioning -> processioning openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ramdisk -> ram disk, ram-disk, radish openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unprovisioned -> unprovided openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pxe -> exp, pee, pie openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841 ['0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841', '0.1-0.1.gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841'] openstack-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ironic-python-agent python2-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Python library for the ironic python agent. python2-ironic-python-agent.noarch: W: no-documentation python2-ironic-python-agent-doc.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Documentation for ironic python agent. openstack-ironic-python-agent.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) deprovisioning -> processioning openstack-ironic-python-agent.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ramdisk -> ram disk, ram-disk, radish openstack-ironic-python-agent.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unprovisioned -> unprovided openstack-ironic-python-agent.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pxe -> exp, pee, pie openstack-ironic-python-agent.src:84: W: macro-in-comment %{upstream_version} openstack-ironic-python-agent.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ironic-python-agent-0.1.0.dev731.tar.gz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings. Requires -------- python2-ironic-python-agent-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openstack-ironic-python-agent (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/python2 config(openstack-ironic-python-agent) python-ironic-python-agent systemd python2-ironic-python-agent (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python-babel python-eventlet python-iso8601 python-netifaces python-oslo-concurrency python-oslo-config python-oslo-i18n python-oslo-log python-oslo-serialization python-oslo-service python-oslo-utils python-pbr python-pecan python-pint python-psutil python-pyudev python-requests python-six python-stevedore python-wsme Provides -------- python2-ironic-python-agent-doc: python2-ironic-python-agent-doc openstack-ironic-python-agent: config(openstack-ironic-python-agent) openstack-ironic-python-agent python2-ironic-python-agent: python-ironic-python-agent python2-ironic-python-agent Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1257329 Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Hello, Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-1.fc23.src.rpm and koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13932412 Thanks, Chandan Kumar
Hi Chandan, The spec has an issue with the "%{_bindir}/gabbi-run" executable, which is included in both the python2 and python3 subpackages, creating issues (besides the conflict, the python2 subpkg requires python3 when built). You may want to apply a similar fix to the one in http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-reno.git/tree/python-reno.spec . Also, any reason to exclude gabbits_intercept? I don't see anything in the spec file. Other than that, the spec looks good to me. Javier
Hello Jpena, Thanks for reviewing it. Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-2.fc23.src.rpm and koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13934602 Thanks, Chandan Kumar
Hi Chandan, Another couple of comments: - This package provides an executable file so it should provide a man page for it. Upstream package provides a man page for "gabbi" which includes help for running gabbi-run so i think it'd be nice to include it. - Would it be possible to add tests execution in %check? Best regards, Alfredo
Hello Alfredo, Thanks for reviewing it. * manpage added * %checks are included Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-3.fc23.src.rpm and Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13944220 Thanks, Chandan Kumar
Hi Chandan, Some comments: - About manpage, great!! - About tests in %checks, i've seen some tests are failing because of (https://github.com/cdent/gabbi/issues/133), so i think it's ok to leave the || About dependencies, I think it should have a Requires on python3-urllib3. Best regards, Alfredo
Hello Alfredo, Thanks for the review. Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.17.5-1.fc23.src.rpm and koji build scratch : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13949960 Thanks, Chandan Kumar
The spec looks good to me now. Best regards, Alfredo
Hello, Here is the updated SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi.spec SRPM : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc23.src.rpm and koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13982971 Thanks, Chandan Kumar
Everything looks ok now, thanks! fedora-review is complaining that the package source cannot be downloaded from the location specified in Source0, not sure if that is an issue in pyp2rpm or something else. The package is APPROVED, please go ahead and submit the SCM request. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1252812-python-gabbi/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages, /usr/lib/python3.5 [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages, /usr/lib/python3.5 [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag Note: Could not download Source0: https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gabbi/gabbi-1.19.0.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-gabbi , python3-gabbi , python-gabbi-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python3-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-gabbi-doc-1.19.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc25.src.rpm python2-gabbi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-urllib3 python2-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary python2-gabbi-run python3-gabbi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-urllib3 python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-python2-jsonpath-rw-extmanual-page-for-binary python3-gabbi-run python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run python-gabbi.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gabbi/gabbi-1.19.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-gabbi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-urllib3 python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary python3-gabbi-run python3-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gabbi-run python2-gabbi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-urllib3 python2-gabbi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary python2-gabbi-run 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- python3-gabbi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3-PyYAML python3-colorama python3-jsonpath-rw-ext python3-pbr python3-pytest python3-setuptools python3-six python3-urllib3 python3-wsgi_intercept python-gabbi-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python2-gabbi python2-gabbi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python2 PyYAML pytest python(abi) python-colorama python-jsonpath-rw-ext python-pbr python-setuptools python-six python-urllib3 python-wsgi_intercept Provides -------- python3-gabbi: python3-gabbi python-gabbi-doc: python-gabbi-doc python2-gabbi: python-gabbi python2-gabbi Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1252812 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6323cc7eb1
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6323cc7eb1
python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.