Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1254102

Summary: Discovery rules page "undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass" in case hostgroup was deleted
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Alexander Braverman <abraverm>
Component: Discovery PluginAssignee: Lukas Zapletal <lzap>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Stephen Benjamin <stbenjam>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.1.0CC: abalakht, bbuckingham, bkearney, lzap, mmccune, pmutha, sghai, stbenjam, szadok, xdmoon
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/11574
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 09:17:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1338516    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Foreman debug none

Description Alexander Braverman 2015-08-17 07:42:19 UTC
Created attachment 1063664 [details]
Foreman debug

Description of problem:
Opening 'Discovery Rules' page results with an error:
undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.1.1

How reproducible:
Open 'Discovery Rules'

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Satellite was upgraded from 6.1.0 to 6.1.1

Comment 2 Shlomi Zadok 2015-08-17 11:53:40 UTC
Upstream seems to solve this issue at https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_discovery/blob/develop/app/views/discovery_rules/index.html.erb#L19
Can this be cherry-picked?

Comment 3 Lukas Zapletal 2015-08-17 11:56:22 UTC
Which commit sha is that? Can you please prepare cherry pick request for that?

Comment 5 Sachin Ghai 2015-08-17 12:21:07 UTC
Reproduced. If we delete Hostgroup after associating it to Discovery Rule.

Comment 8 Lukas Zapletal 2015-08-26 13:11:48 UTC
The above commit only masks the fact a rule does not have a hostgroup.

Comment 9 Lukas Zapletal 2015-08-26 13:17:54 UTC
Upstream patch done: https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_discovery/pull/212

Cherry pick the UI patch as well ^^^

Comment 15 Bryan Kearney 2016-01-04 21:34:51 UTC
Upstream bug assigned to lzap

Comment 16 Bryan Kearney 2016-02-16 09:09:12 UTC
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/11574 has been closed
-------------
Anonymous
Applied in changeset commit:foreman_discovery|82d93bfb7748482ca32ab293d8c0b47c38c4c018.

Comment 18 Stephen Benjamin 2016-03-24 17:01:18 UTC
Created hostgroup Foo, with discovery rule Bar.  Tried to delete hostgroup Foo, it's no longer possible: "Cannot delete record because dependent discovery rules exist"

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-27 09:17:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501