Bug 1255149 - Unable to call a reusable process that contains a "_" (underscore) in the name in BPM Suite 6.1.2
Summary: Unable to call a reusable process that contains a "_" (underscore) in the nam...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: jBPM Designer
Version: 6.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
unspecified
Target Milestone: ER4
: 6.2.0
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact: Lukáš Petrovický
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1260211
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-08-19 18:50 UTC by Amana
Modified: 2020-03-27 20:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
: 1260211 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 20:10:23 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 1593173 0 None None None Never

Description Amana 2015-08-19 18:50:59 UTC
Description of problem:
When naming a reusable process using "_" (i.e. test_sample_new), it is not listed under "Called Element" to the parent process.

I am unsure if it is really a bug or if it is the expected behavior... I mean it could be a kind of "reserved" sign as it is listing resusable processes that contains "." or "-" in their names. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
BPM Suite 6.1.x


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a main process with a Reusable subprocess node;
2. Create a simple process as "test_sample_new" (it can contain only a ScriptTask);
3. Create another process as "testSampleNew" (it can contain only a ScriptTask);
4. Back to the main process, click on "Called Element"...

Actual results:
It will list only the "testSampleNew";

Expected results:
It should list both processes, maybe?


Additional info:
A workaround would be to use "." or "-" or other sign.

Comment 1 Amana 2015-08-19 18:51:54 UTC
Hi all,

Is it really a bug? Or a reserved sign?

Thanks!

Comment 3 Amana 2015-08-24 14:09:48 UTC
any updates?

Comment 5 jvahala 2015-10-19 13:50:39 UTC
Verified with 6.2.0ER4.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.