Bug 1255396 - BuildID[sha1] sum is architecture dependent
BuildID[sha1] sum is architecture dependent
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: file (Show other bugs)
7.1
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity low
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Jan Kaluža
Karel Srot
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-08-20 09:13 EDT by Karel Srot
Modified: 2015-11-19 03:11 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: file-5.11-31.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 03:11:17 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Karel Srot 2015-08-20 09:13:28 EDT
Description of problem:

I am curious whether this is expected.

[x86_64]# rpm -q file
file-5.11-28.el7.x86_64
[x86_64]# file cpupower 
cpupower: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, BuildID[sha1]=0x0640a8e22aa338787f3d513883f3e7764e0c1318, stripped

but the same file on ppc64

[ppc64]# rpm -q file
file-5.11-29.el7.ppc64
[ppc64]# file cpupower 
cpupower: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, BuildID[sha1]=0xe2a840067838a32a38513d7f76e7f38318130c4e, stripped

Seem to be caused by different endianity but is this expected?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Jan Kaluža 2015-09-01 03:37:17 EDT
This is fixed in following upstream bugreport: http://bugs.gw.com/view.php?id=208
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 03:11:17 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2155.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.