Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1257028

Summary: Can't print an envelope (Oki B4350)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Todd <ToddAndMargo>
Component: foomatic-dbAssignee: Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Petr Sklenar <psklenar>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.1CC: jpopelka, psklenar, thozza, ToddAndMargo
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FastFix, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: foomatic-db-4.0-41.20130911.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 22:17:25 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed patch
none
ppd file for Okidata B4350 none

Description Todd 2015-08-26 06:30:21 UTC
Dear Red Hat,

I am coming from the community: Scientific Linux 7.1.

$ rpm -qa cups
cups-1.6.3-17.el7_1.1.x86_64

$ uname -r
3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64

Printer: Okidata B4350

I just upgraded to Scientific Linux 7.1 from SL 6.7 (total wipe and fresh install).

Now I can't print an envelope to my Oki B4350.  Paper size mismatch.  CUPS tells my printer that a #10 envelope (Monarch Envelope) is a B5 piece of paper.  overriding the prompt from my printer results in a ruined envelope.

This reproduces from Libre Office and Lotus Approach and Word Pro running under Wine Staging.

Many thanks,
-T

Comment 3 Todd 2015-08-26 22:16:09 UTC
Figured it out.  The ppd you include with CUPS for the Oki B4350 is a NIGHTMARE!

The current ppd for the Oki B4350 fixes the issue:
http://openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=ljet4&printer=Oki-B4350&show=1

Please correct your CUPS rpm to include the proper PPD.

Many thanks,
-T

Comment 4 Todd 2015-08-26 22:19:38 UTC
Here is the link to the Oki B4350 page:

http://openprinting.org/printer/Oki/Oki-B4350

Comment 7 Zdenek Dohnal 2016-10-21 12:07:08 UTC
Hi Todd,

if I fix this bug, would you mind testing it, if it works, please?

Comment 8 Todd 2016-10-21 18:53:10 UTC
Sure.  But there is really nothing to fix.  You just use the ppd from

http://openprinting.org/printer/Oki/Oki-B4350

and ditch the old, bad one

Comment 9 Zdenek Dohnal 2017-01-19 21:56:48 UTC
Todd, would you mind trying these rpms https://zdohnal.fedorapeople.org/.foomatic-db/ ?

Comment 10 Zdenek Dohnal 2017-01-19 21:57:52 UTC
Created attachment 1242617 [details]
Proposed patch

Comment 11 Todd 2017-01-20 19:20:32 UTC
Hi Zdenek,

"Foomatic" had nothing to do with problem.  It was the ppm that was seriously out-of-date.  After installing the current ppm and only the current ppm (nothing else), the problem was solved.  Foomatic never changed.

The problem is that your ppm's are way, way, seriously out-of-date.\

-T

Comment 12 Zdenek Dohnal 2017-01-23 09:01:32 UTC
Todd,

PPD for your printer is supposed to be shipped by foomatic-db package, so IMHO it is foomatic-db problem. Your "installing the current PPD" probably only overwrote ancient PPD shipped by foomatic-db - so my fix is that foomatic-db package will ship current PPD, which should work for you (that's why I asked you to test the package - better to be sure it is working), so you do not have to manually install current PPD.
So would you mind testing these rpms?

Comment 13 Todd 2017-01-23 09:03:22 UTC
Hi Zdenek,

No problem, but it may be a week or so till I get enough office time

-T

Comment 14 Todd 2017-02-06 23:03:17 UTC
Created attachment 1248224 [details]
ppd file for Okidata B4350

Hi Zdenek,

I downloaded "foomatic-db-4.0-40.20130911.el7.noarch.rpm" from pbone.net and took a look inside.  There is not a single ppd file included in the package.

I have attached my ppd for you to compare with yours.

-T

Comment 15 Zdenek Dohnal 2017-02-07 09:48:01 UTC
Todd,

would you mind downloading and testing rpms from this link https://zdohnal.fedorapeople.org/.foomatic-db/ ? Because rpms from different sources is meaningless for finding out if our rpms are working fine. And ppds are in foomatic-db-ppds subpackage, which should be installed with base foomatic-db package.

Comment 16 Todd 2017-02-23 23:12:40 UTC
Hi Zdenek,

The ppd inside:

foomatic-db-ppds-4.0-41.20130911.el7.noarch.rpm/usr/share/foomatic/db/source/PPD/Oki/ok4350u1.ppd.gz

Is identical to the one I downloaded from Open Printing:

http://openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=ljet4&printer=Oki-B4350&show=1


Thank you!

-T

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 22:17:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2028

Comment 22 Todd 2017-08-05 06:03:26 UTC
Thank you!