Bug 1257273
| Summary: | Heat templates fail on validation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Jeremy <jmelvin> | ||||
| Component: | openstack-heat | Assignee: | Steve Baker <sbaker> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Amit Ugol <augol> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | ddomingo, jmelvin, ohochman, sbaker, sclewis, scohen, shardy, yeylon, zbitter | ||||
| Target Milestone: | z2 | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||
| Target Release: | 7.0 (Kilo) | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-heat-2015.1.1-4.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: |
Null values are now converted to empty strings. This change was done to prevent validation failures in perfectly valid template resources, which prevented them from being created in previous releases.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-10-08 12:20:41 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jeremy
2015-08-26 15:37:57 UTC
Is the problem with hot.yaml#55, which isn't valid yaml:
eth0_otherAllowed: { LIST: [
"ip_address": { get_param: [NET_info, Net1, cidr] },
] }
should probably be
eth0_otherAllowed: { LIST: [
{"ip_address": { get_param: [NET_info, Net1, cidr] }},
] }
(I just made the same comment upstream)
That is valid yaml, and no that isn't the problem. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1865 |