Bug 1258165 - /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh don't extract debug infos.
/usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh don't extract debug infos.
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
21
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: packaging-team-maint
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-08-29 15:57 EDT by Frank Büttner
Modified: 2015-08-31 05:21 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-31 05:21:45 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
sample srpm file (14.91 MB, application/x-rpm)
2015-08-29 15:57 EDT, Frank Büttner
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Frank Büttner 2015-08-29 15:57:16 EDT
Created attachment 1068317 [details]
sample srpm file

Description of problem:
When build packages on F22 for F21 via mock, an empty debug file is created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-build-4.12.0.1-7.fc21.x86_64

How reproducible:
every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. mock -r fedora-21-x86_64 sample.srpm

Actual results:
An empty debug file is created.

Expected results:
Debug file with debug info.
Comment 1 Ľuboš Kardoš 2015-08-31 05:21:45 EDT
Your %{_libdir}/purple-2/telegram-purple.so doesn't have set executable bit.

From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo:

* find-debuginfo.sh processes only files that are executable when it's run; for practical purposes one can assume that happens under the hood after the %install section. Make sure that all ELF binaries (executables, shared libraries, DSO's) are executable at end of %install.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.