Bug 1259900 - Add tripleo::packages and package_manifest resource for yum/puppet integration
Summary: Add tripleo::packages and package_manifest resource for yum/puppet integration
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-puppet-modules
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: z2
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Ivan Chavero
QA Contact: Amit Ugol
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1259905 1262189
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-03 18:25 UTC by Zane Bitter
Modified: 2023-02-22 23:02 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-15.el7ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-08 12:24:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 193393 0 None MERGED Add tripleo::packages 2020-09-27 20:34:48 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 203803 0 None MERGED Add package_manifest resource. 2020-09-27 20:34:43 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1872 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openstack-puppet-modules bug fix and enhancement update 2015-10-08 16:14:03 UTC

Description Zane Bitter 2015-09-03 18:25:39 UTC
In order to integrate yum with Puppet for overcloud package updates, we need the following two upstream patches:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193393/ (Add tripleo::packages)

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203803/ (Add package_manifest resource)

Comment 1 Ivan Chavero 2015-09-07 16:00:57 UTC
There's a comment on patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203803/ that suggest to go in another direction which might prevent it to be merged upstream. Since this bug is a blocker i can add the patch to OPM package and take it out once the upstream solution is addressed. Any thougts?

Comment 3 Zane Bitter 2015-09-09 18:42:10 UTC
Ideally I'd like to get something that is accepted as a good long-term direction upstream. But I am not a Puppet developer, so we'll need somebody who is to push this forward.

Comment 4 Amit Ugol 2015-09-13 08:46:04 UTC
@Zane, with those patches in, should I be able to update or am I just checking that they made it in the latest version?

Comment 5 Zane Bitter 2015-09-14 14:13:07 UTC
Just checking that it went in, I think. Bug 1259905 is the one that provides the actual ability to update.

Comment 6 Amit Ugol 2015-09-22 08:36:13 UTC
the needed bits are introduced in the latest version

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-10-08 12:24:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1872


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.