Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1259900

Summary: Add tripleo::packages and package_manifest resource for yum/puppet integration
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Zane Bitter <zbitter>
Component: openstack-puppet-modulesAssignee: Ivan Chavero <ichavero>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Amit Ugol <augol>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)CC: dprince, emilien, kbasil, lbezdick, mburns, michele, sbaker, sclewis, yeylon, zbitter
Target Milestone: z2Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: 7.0 (Kilo)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-15.el7ost Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-08 12:24:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1259905, 1262189    

Description Zane Bitter 2015-09-03 18:25:39 UTC 
In order to integrate yum with Puppet for overcloud package updates, we need the following two upstream patches:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193393/ (Add tripleo::packages)

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203803/ (Add package_manifest resource)
Comment 1 Ivan Chavero 2015-09-07 16:00:57 UTC 
There's a comment on patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203803/ that suggest to go in another direction which might prevent it to be merged upstream. Since this bug is a blocker i can add the patch to OPM package and take it out once the upstream solution is addressed. Any thougts?
Comment 3 Zane Bitter 2015-09-09 18:42:10 UTC 
Ideally I'd like to get something that is accepted as a good long-term direction upstream. But I am not a Puppet developer, so we'll need somebody who is to push this forward.
Comment 4 Amit Ugol 2015-09-13 08:46:04 UTC 
@Zane, with those patches in, should I be able to update or am I just checking that they made it in the latest version?
Comment 5 Zane Bitter 2015-09-14 14:13:07 UTC 
Just checking that it went in, I think. Bug 1259905 is the one that provides the actual ability to update.
Comment 6 Amit Ugol 2015-09-22 08:36:13 UTC 
the needed bits are introduced in the latest version
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-10-08 12:24:10 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1872