Bug 1260858 - glusterd: volume status backward compatibility
Summary: glusterd: volume status backward compatibility
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: glusterd
Version: 3.7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: hari gowtham
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1255694
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-08 05:33 UTC by hari gowtham
Modified: 2015-10-14 10:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.7.5
Clone Of: 1255694
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-14 10:29:07 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description hari gowtham 2015-09-08 05:33:48 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1255694 +++

Description of problem:
The volume status command doesn't display all the bricks when the cluster is a mixed cluster. It displays the bricks in the higher gluster version(3.8) but the bricks in the lower version (3.6) is not displayed. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.create a mixed cluster with 3.6 and 3.8
2.create a volume wit bricks in both the nodes
3.Issue gluster v status 

Actual results:
Status of volume: vol1
Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick 10.70.42.171:/data/gluster/tier/cbr2  49153     0          Y       13608
NFS Server on localhost                     N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
NFS Server on dhcp42-203.lab.eng.blr.redhat
.com                                        N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
 
Task Status of Volume vol1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume tasks


Expected results:
Status of volume: vol1
Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick 10.70.42.171:/data/gluster/tier/cbr2  49153     0          Y       31879
Brick 10.70.42.203:/data/gluster/tier/cbr2  49154     0          Y       27686
NFS Server on localhost                     N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
NFS Server on dhcp42-203.lab.eng.blr.redhat
.com                                        N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
 
Task Status of Volume vol1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume tasks


Additional info:
The brick on the host, 10.70.42.203 (3.6) was missing.

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-21 08:57:48 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#1) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-24 01:58:00 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#2) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-24 02:00:06 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#3) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-28 03:25:41 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#4) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-28 03:43:05 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#5) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-09-04 03:49:41 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11986 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#7) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2015-09-08 05:34:49 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12120 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#1) for review on release-3.7 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 2 Vijay Bellur 2015-09-08 09:11:38 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12120 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#2) for review on release-3.7 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2015-09-09 05:22:44 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12120 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#3) for review on release-3.7 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 4 Vijay Bellur 2015-09-10 05:20:45 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12120 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#4) for review on release-3.7 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 5 Vijay Bellur 2015-09-14 05:40:41 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12120 (glusterd: volume status backward compatibility) posted (#5) for review on release-3.7 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)

Comment 6 Pranith Kumar K 2015-10-14 10:29:07 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-glusterfs-3.7.5, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-glusterfs-3.7.5 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-October/023968.html
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 7 Pranith Kumar K 2015-10-14 10:38:10 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.5, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.5 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-October/023968.html
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.