Bug 1261912 - [RFE] Enable AD/ADFS support in RGW
Summary: [RFE] Enable AD/ADFS support in RGW
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 1.3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.0
Assignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat)
QA Contact: shylesh
Bara Ancincova
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1244737 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1322504
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-10 12:19 UTC by Vimal Kumar
Modified: 2019-12-16 04:56 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.0-1.el7cp
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Documented with BZ#1261891
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 19:26:21 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 1758493 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1755 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.0 bug fix and enhancement update 2016-08-23 23:23:52 UTC

Comment 2 Neil Levine 2015-09-22 18:47:07 UTC 
*** Bug 1244737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Marcus Watts 2016-03-14 22:21:01 UTC 
STS is NOT in master or v10.0.3.  And not in the "jewel" branch by March 9th.  The current plan is to target kraken & backport to jewel.
Comment 7 Neil Levine 2016-03-14 23:03:48 UTC 
Ths card refers to the native AD support, not STS.

STS is covered under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274084
Comment 8 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-26 20:44:38 UTC 
Matt, is this feature complete in v10.2.0?
Comment 9 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-05-10 20:32:30 UTC 
This is AD LDAP support, not STS.

From the call today: It is in v10.2.0
Comment 15 shylesh 2016-08-04 15:36:49 UTC 
Verified with AD on Windows 2012. All the targeted tests are complete hence marking this as verified.

Special thanks to Matt for providing his AD setup for testing.
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 19:26:21 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.