Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 126448 - Package aspell-pt_BR isn't necessary.
Package aspell-pt_BR isn't necessary.
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Elliot Lee
Bill Nottingham
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-06-21 15:18 EDT by Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:46 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-07-09 18:05:11 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira 2004-06-21 15:18:26 EDT
Description of problem:

This isn't a problem, but the aspell-pt_BR package is not necessary
anymore. The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary contained in this package
is also contained in the aspell-pt package.

Moreover, due to the naming rules of aspell dictionaries, the
dictionaries installed by the aspell-pt_BR package are *never* used,
unless explicitly asked for (and I don't know how to do it inside
Evolution or Gaim, for example). Aspell can choose the appropriate
language using the LC_ALL environment variable, but this requires that
all dictionaries be in ISO lang code form and end in .multi. The
aspell-pt dictionaries do so, so they are (correctly) used instead.

It is Good Thing(tm) to use only the dictionaries in the aspell-pt
package. It works perfectly for me.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
aspell-0.50.3-19.1 aspell-pt-0.50-7.1 aspell-pt_BR-2.4-14.1
Comment 1 Eido Inoue 2004-06-23 10:21:27 EDT
i agree. changing component so it gets pulled out of comps.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-06-29 01:02:54 EDT
Assigning to rel-eng.
Comment 3 Elliot Lee 2004-07-09 18:05:11 EDT
Package is dying dying... dead.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.