Spec URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/autocloud.spec SRPM URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/autocloud-0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: A test framework which automatically downloads and tests Fedora cloud image builds from koji. Fedora Account System Username: rtnpro
This is failing for build because of[0] and throw error, please include and do scratch build for rawhide and see if that build without issue. RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/autocloud.service Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/autocloud.spec Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 84, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 493, in do raise exception.Error("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#.25files_section
Fixed the above errors by including systemd in BuildRequires list. Here's the updated SPEC and SRPM files: Spec URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/autocloud.spec SRPM URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/autocloud-0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autocloud See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 30 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/prkumar/fedora- scm/1264561-autocloud/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/httpd, /usr/lib/systemd/system, /etc/httpd/conf.d, /usr/lib/systemd [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: autocloud-0.1-2.fc21.noarch.rpm autocloud-0.1-2.fc21.src.rpm autocloud.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US koji -> Kojak autocloud.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary autocloud_job autocloud.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US koji -> Kojak 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- autocloud.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US koji -> Kojak autocloud.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary autocloud_job 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires -------- autocloud (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh config(autocloud) fedmsg python(abi) python-flask python-redis python-retask python-sqlalchemy python-sqlalchemy-utils Provides -------- autocloud: autocloud config(autocloud) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/kushaldas/autocloud/archive/88b1619386a843e585cd9f44bb267ed03d42ae5f.tar.gz#/autocloud-88b1619.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 36ca88f0a49a7e300cd31761760b2558326e98c8a021bc8403cfe7ff9a7ce926 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 36ca88f0a49a7e300cd31761760b2558326e98c8a021bc8403cfe7ff9a7ce926 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1264561 Buildroot used: fedora-21-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Fixed all the issues listed above and updated the SPEC and SRPM file at: Spec URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/autocloud.spec SRPM URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/autocloud-0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
(In reply to Ratnadeep Debnath from comment #4) > Fixed all the issues listed above and updated the SPEC and SRPM file at: > > Spec URL: https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/autocloud.spec > SRPM URL: > https://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/autocloud-0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm Check about scm: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests ===== Approved =====
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: autocloud Short Description: A test framework which automatically downloads and tests Fedora cloud image builds from koji. Owners: rtnpro kushal sayanchowdhury kumarpraveen Branches: F-23 InitialCC: rtnpro kushal sayanchowdhury kumarpraveen
User "sayanchowdhury" is not in the packager group
======================= Package Name: autocloud Short Description: A test framework which automatically downloads and tests Fedora cloud image builds from koji. Owners: rtnpro kushal kumarpraveen Branches: F-23 InitialCC: rtnpro kushal kumarpraveen
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: autocloud New Branches: f22 Owners: rtnpro kushal kumarpraveen
Git done (by process-git-requests).
autocloud-0.1-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-591ec3c5d2
autocloud-0.1-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update autocloud' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-591ec3c5d2
csutherl's scratch build of fedora-tomcat-epel?#9661f8da0d7e82b63ef65ebe467e0eb103ae624f for el6-candidate and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-tomcat-epel?#9661f8da0d7e82b63ef65ebe467e0eb103ae624f failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11823023
Autocloud is in Fedora, I believe this should be closed.