Bug 1264656 - Review Request: rubygem-ace-rails-ap - The Ajax.org Cloud9 Editor.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ace-rails-ap - The Ajax.org Cloud9 Editor.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-19 22:27 UTC by Ilia Gradina
Modified: 2020-08-10 00:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:52:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ilia Gradina 2015-09-19 22:27:42 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/master/rubygems/rubygem-ace-rails-ap.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-ace-rails-ap-4.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: The Ajax.org Cloud9 Editor (Ace) for the Rails 3.1+ asset pipeline.
Fedora Account System Username: ilgrad

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-09-24 15:05:02 UTC
jgrulich's scratch build of kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 for f22-candidate and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11212117

Comment 2 Ilia Gradina 2015-09-24 22:55:26 UTC
(In reply to Upstream Release Monitoring from comment #1)
> jgrulich's scratch build of
> kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 for f22-candidate and
> git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/
> kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 completed
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11212117

It is mistake?

Comment 3 Vít Ondruch 2015-09-25 11:25:00 UTC
Just a few quick points:

* What about test suite?
* How about bundling? This directory looks suspicious: %{gem_instdir}/vendor
* You list several BuildRequires which you definitely don't need ATM, since you don't execute the test suite.
* We typically try to avoid build time dependency on Bundler as much as possible. Not sure this will be the case, but its always worth asking.

Comment 4 Ilia Gradina 2015-09-29 13:36:47 UTC
Thx Vit,

unfortunately the tests I have not found. I made the changes according to your notes.

Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-ace-rails-ap.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-ace-rails-ap-4.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

Comment 5 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-09-29 13:40:37 UTC
ilgrad's scratch build of rubygem-ace-rails-ap-4.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11266095

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2015-09-30 08:57:43 UTC
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #4)
> unfortunately the tests I have not found.

I see, no tests in upstream. Have you asked them? And even though there are no tests, it is a good habit to leave note in the .spec file.

BTW how are you going address the bundling?

Comment 8 Vít Ondruch 2016-10-05 15:59:49 UTC
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> BTW how are you going address the bundling?

You still have not addressed this concern ^^. If you are going to keep the bundled library, then you should at minimum:

1) Explain the reasons why.
2) Add the "bundled" provide.
3) Update the license, since the ACE appears to be of some BSD license.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle

Comment 9 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:52:41 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 10 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:52:32 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.