Bug 1266993
| Summary: | restarting rpbind also restart the the nfs server | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Steve Dickson <steved> | |
| Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Yongcheng Yang <yoyang> | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 7.2 | CC: | eguan, fs-qe, steved, tlavigne | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | nfs-utils-1.3.0-0.21.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1279526 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 04:30:25 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1279526 | |||
|
Description
Steve Dickson
2015-09-28 18:43:03 UTC
There exist an issue: stooping of the NFS server can start rpcbind.
Don't know whether it make sense or not.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. service nfs start; service rpcbind stop; service rpcbind status
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ make sure nfs.service is active
2. service nfs stop; service rpcbind status
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ stopping nfs.service can start rpcbind.service
[root@ibm-x3650m4-08 ~]# rpm -q nfs-utils
nfs-utils-1.3.0-0.21.el7.x86_64
[root@ibm-x3650m4-08 ~]# service nfs start; service rpcbind stop; service rpcbind status
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start nfs.service
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop rpcbind.service
Warning: Stopping rpcbind.service, but it can still be activated by:
rpcbind.socket
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status rpcbind.service
● rpcbind.service - RPC bind service
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service; indirect; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: inactive (dead) since Wed 2015-09-30 17:23:23 CST; 18ms ago
Process: 20978 ExecStart=/sbin/rpcbind -w ${RPCBIND_ARGS} (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 20981 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Sep 30 17:21:27 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Starting RPC bind service...
Sep 30 17:21:27 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Started RPC bind service.
Sep 30 17:23:23 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Stopping RPC bind service...
Sep 30 17:23:23 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Stopped RPC bind service.
[root@ibm-x3650m4-08 ~]# service nfs stop; service rpcbind status
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop nfs.service
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status rpcbind.service
● rpcbind.service - RPC bind service
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service; indirect; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Wed 2015-09-30 17:23:30 CST; 7ms ago
Process: 21089 ExecStart=/sbin/rpcbind -w ${RPCBIND_ARGS} (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 21091 (rpcbind)
CGroup: /system.slice/rpcbind.service
└─21091 /sbin/rpcbind -w
Sep 30 17:23:30 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Starting RPC bind service...
Sep 30 17:23:30 ibm-x3650m4-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com systemd[1]: Started RPC bind service.
[root@ibm-x3650m4-08 ~]#
(In reply to Yongcheng Yang from comment #5) > There exist an issue: stooping of the NFS server can start rpcbind. > Don't know whether it make sense or not. > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. service nfs start; service rpcbind stop; service rpcbind status > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ make sure nfs.service is active > 2. service nfs stop; service rpcbind status > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ stopping nfs.service can start rpcbind.servicer rpcbind is started because one of the daemon tried to access it. A while back systemd socket activation support was added which means if a daemon tries to connect to port 111 systemd will start rpcbind automaticly. So this does make sense Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2196.html |