Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 12670
dump/restore - should be OK to lose the suid bits now
Last modified: 2008-05-01 11:37:56 EDT
Summary says it all really.
To review why dump/restore were originally suid-root, it was to allow
non-root users to do network backups. This required a privileged low port
Recent versions of dump/restore (including the version shipped with BETA1)
support an alternative mechanism which does _not_ require the binaries
to be suid-root (or sgid I guess). The mechanism is via an environment
From the man-page of dump
RSH Dump uses the contents of this variable to determine the name
of the remote shell command to use when doing remote backups
(rsh, ssh etc.). If this variable is not set, rcmd(3) will
be used, but only root will be able to do remote backups.
Also from the man-page
Dump cannot do remote backups without being run as root, due to its secu-
rity history. Presently, it works if you set it setuid (like it used to
be), but this might constitute a security risk. Note that you can set RSH
to use a remote shell program instead.
So the upstream author explicits recommends no suid/sgid bits and
thoughtfully provides an alternative for the few users of non-root network
And comments from the field
Stelian Pop <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
For a default setup, I suggest the second method (you can always enable the
suid-root bit later if needed, after reading the man page and accepting
the security implications).
Someone else said they were one of the few people who used the network
backups as a non-root user, but said they still wished the default was
non-suid due to the security implications.
Pretty please, consider shipping dump,restore,dump.static and
restore.static without any privilege? ;-)
At the very least try it for a public beta and see if anyone complains!
Not fixed in BETA2 - version updated
Incidentally - am I dreaming or is /sbin/dump missing in BETA2?
fixed today, Chris. thanks.
The setuid bits are gone, but both executables have group tty. I guess they
should have group root.
Hrm, yes. Fixed in dump-0.4b17-8.