Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
The WAL journaling mode does not work in sqlite 3.6.20-1 available at RHEL 6.
WAL Journaling mode is required for the Data Tiering feature of Red Hat Gluster Storage on RHEL 6
It is required to upgrade sqlite version on RHEL 6.7 to sqlite 3.7 and above, which supports WAL journaling mode
We measured the performance of our tiering feature with the current version of sqlite in RHEL 6.7 and it is very poor. We won't have a viable feature without sqlite 3.7 or higher. We need RHEL PM to weigh this request very closely as RHGS's tiering feature is not usable without a rebase of the sqlite version in RHEL. Our other alternative would be to carry a newer version of sqlite in our channels and we're trying to avoid doing that.
So we have a risk of issues on customers side (remember, we speak about data here, not only broken application) and performance improvement (how big?) on the other side. For me, bundling the sqlite with RHGS is the only viable choice here.
Is there no plan to rebase sqlite for the entire life-cycle of RHEL 6 i.e. till 2020? We waited for the RHEL 6.8 planning window to open to make our request.
(In reply to Sayan Saha from comment #7)
> Is there no plan to rebase sqlite for the entire life-cycle of RHEL 6 i.e.
> till 2020? We waited for the RHEL 6.8 planning window to open to make our
> request.
Currently there is no such plan, which means the sqlite would stay in 3.6 till EOL of RHEL-6, yes. As already said, there are big risks that we would cause troubles by doing the rebase. From my PoV, the benefits are not worth such a big risk.
Created attachment 1100643[details]
RHGS tiering performance delta when using a newer version of sqlite
Please find attached a graph that shows how big the performance difference is for the toering feature in RHGS if we use a newer version of sqlite.
Sayan, I see your point, the performance delta seems to be significant.
However, that doesn't change the statement that upgrading in RHEL 6 would be too risky. The upstream says [1]:
"... Since 2004, there have been enhancements to SQLite such that newer database files are unreadable by older versions of the SQLite library..."
Such forward incompatibility ^^ is something we cannot afford in RHEL minor update, because it can easily lead to issues like in [2].
That said, I'd like to ask you to think seriously about some alternative solution, like having own release of sqlite for your product.
[1] https://www.sqlite.org/formatchng.html
[2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28413683/backwards-compatibility-with-sqlite-db