First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1268022 - high CPU usage by the plasmashell process
high CPU usage by the plasmashell process
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: plasma-desktop (Show other bugs)
rawhide
x86_64 Linux
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: KDE SIG
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2015-10-01 11:07 EDT by Randy Barlow
Modified: 2015-10-01 11:27 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-01 11:27:44 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
KDE Software Compilation 348385 None None None Never

  None (edit)
Description Randy Barlow 2015-10-01 11:07:14 EDT 
Description of problem:
The plasmashell process often uses 100% of the CPU. This bug has been filed upstream, but I wanted to file a downstream bug to track the issue as well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
% rpm -q plasma-desktop
plasma-desktop-5.4.1-6.fc24.x86_64

How reproducible:
I'm unsure how to reproduce the problem, but it happens every day as I use KDE eventually.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use KDE for a while.

Actual results:
Eventually, the plasmashell process will probably be using 100% of the CPU.

Expected results:
No infinite loops ☺
Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2015-10-01 11:27:44 EDT 
Thanks, the upstream fix should be included in plasma-5.4.2, which will be coming to updates-testing over the next week (or so).

Please re-open if problems persist after upgrading.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.