Description of problem: As far as I can see RHEL 6.7 is completely missing. 7.1 is present but for some reason virt-manager when using http/.treeinfo identifies it as rhel7.0 OTOH when using ISO media 7.1, 6.7 and 6.6 are identified as Unknown. Also for Atomic Host the current defaults for memory should be 2 GiB because the installer contains the OStree content inside itself. See bug #1235558. The file command reports the following for these ISOs RHEL-6.4-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'RHEL_6.4 x86_64 boot' (bootable) RHEL-6.5-20131111.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'RHEL_6.5 x86_64 boot' (bootable) RHEL-6.6-20140926.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux' (bootable) RHEL-6.7-20150702.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux' (bootable) RHEL-7.0-20140507.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'RHEL-7.0 x86_64' (bootable) RHEL-7.1-20150219.1-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'RHEL-7.1 x86_64' (bootable) Let me know how to proceed with this b/c I'm not familiar with how libosinfo stored it's data. I see bunch of XML files which looks similar but I have no idea which one to patch.
(In reply to Alexander Todorov from comment #0) > Description of problem: > > As far as I can see RHEL 6.7 is completely missing. > > 7.1 is present but for some reason virt-manager when using http/.treeinfo > identifies it as rhel7.0 I'm not sure libosinfo is involved with identifying these > > OTOH when using ISO media > 7.1, 6.7 and 6.6 are identified as Unknown. 6.6 detection was added upstream in libosinfo v0.2.12, and 7.1 information is only in libosinfo.git > > Also for Atomic Host the current defaults for memory should be 2 GiB because > the installer contains the OStree content inside itself. See bug #1235558. This is documented here indeed https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-atomic-getting-started#memory > > The file command reports the following for these ISOs > > RHEL-6.4-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'RHEL_6.4 x86_64 boot' (bootable) > RHEL-6.5-20131111.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'RHEL_6.5 x86_64 boot' (bootable) > RHEL-6.6-20140926.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux' (bootable) > RHEL-6.7-20150702.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux' (bootable) > RHEL-7.0-20140507.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'RHEL-7.0 x86_64' (bootable) > RHEL-7.1-20150219.1-Server-x86_64-boot.iso: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'RHEL-7.1 x86_64' (bootable) > > > > Let me know how to proceed with this b/c I'm not familiar with how libosinfo > stored it's data. I see bunch of XML files which looks similar but I have no > idea which one to patch. See https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/libosinfo.git/commit/?id=3dcfa43b221b9e5a04878a37f91727696deadd57 https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/libosinfo.git/commit/?id=6c3ddecb5e9167c6eff182ac62358c9e96c47d36 for what was done for adding rhel6.6/rhel7.1 The test cases correspond to 'isoinfo -d -i $isopath' output.
(and reporting only one issue per bug report is generally much more manageable)
See bug #1269099, bug #1269101, bug #1269102 for the other issues. (In reply to Christophe Fergeau from comment #1) > > > > Also for Atomic Host the current defaults for memory should be 2 GiB because > > the installer contains the OStree content inside itself. See bug #1235558. > > This is documented here indeed > https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-atomic-getting-started#memory > Let's track making the default memory settings for Atomic Host 2 GiB here.
master: 1dc75bb4b