Bug 1268616 - [epel7s390x] libgda SRPM does not build correctly on s390x
Summary: [epel7s390x] libgda SRPM does not build correctly on s390x
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: libgda
Version: epel7
Hardware: s390x
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: epel7s390x
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-10-03 17:01 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2020-04-14 11:05 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-14 11:05:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Allow building libgda on IBM JDK (367 bytes, text/plain)
2015-10-03 17:01 UTC, IBM Bug Proxy 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 131317 0 None None None 2019-02-21 09:27:58 UTC

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-03 17:01:37 UTC
Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-03 17:01:39 UTC 
The EPEL 7 SRPM for libgda 
(https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/l/libgda-5.1.2-2.el7.1.src.rpm) 
does not build correctly in Mock on s390x. 

A couple of problems have been observed.

1. The configure script tries to use obsolete GCC options -V and -qversion (around line 6301). Removing these options allowed the script to proceed.

2. Mock installed the IBM JDK on s390x when it saw the java BuildRequires. And configure failed due to a missing linker option that is required when building JNI code on IBM JDK. Adding the attached patch to the .spec file allowed the package to build on IBM JDK.
Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-03 17:01:43 UTC 
Created attachment 1079636 [details]
Allow building libgda on IBM JDK
Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-06 10:14:35 UTC 
------- Comment From hannsj_uhl.com 2015-10-06 10:02 EDT-------
Comment from  William Zhang 2015-10-05 14:47:05 EDT

In fact, the 1st fix is unnecessary.
Comment 4 IBM Bug Proxy 2016-02-23 16:14:18 UTC 
------- Comment From vsandhya.com 2016-02-23 10:09 EDT-------
Any updates?
Comment 5 Georg Markgraf 2017-08-03 09:16:42 UTC 
Expect this is fixed as per RHBZ#1 
... Adding the attached patch to the .spec file allowed the package to build on IBM JDK.
Please update the BZ with latest status  .. thanks in advance
Comment 6 IBM Bug Proxy 2020-04-14 08:02:31 UTC 
------- Comment From tstaudt.com 2020-04-14 03:50 EDT-------
With no activity in this bug for years, I'm now closing this on the IBM side.
If the problem still needs to be addressed, please re-open or preferably open a new bug.

Thanks.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.