Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1269239

Summary: NSS does not support all signature methods for Certificate Verify [rhel-6]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Alicja Kario <hkario>
Component: nssAssignee: Daiki Ueno <dueno>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Alicja Kario <hkario>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.7CC: bryanlharris, dueno, emaldona, hkario, kengert, mpoole, nkinder, omoris, pvrabec, qe-baseos-security, rrelyea, rsawhill
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: nss-3.27.1-6.el6 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1238369 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-21 10:25:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1238369    
Bug Blocks: 1172231, 1271982, 1321112, 1343211    

Description Alicja Kario 2015-10-06 18:54:47 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1238369 +++

Description of problem:
NSS client can sign Certificate Verify only using SHA256 (the PRF used in ciphersuite) or SHA-1. NSS server requests signature on Certificate Verify only using SHA256 (the PRF used). This makes servers unable to interoperate with clients that can sign only using SHA-1. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nss-3.19.1-5.el7_1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use NSS as client or server in connections that require certificates in TLSv1.2

Actual results:
Certificate Verify always is signed using SHA-256 by NSS client
Certificate Request always asks just for RSA+SHA256, DSA+SHA256 or ECDSA+SHA256

Expected results:
most hashes listed as acceptable by server, especially DSA+SHA1 or RSA+SHA1

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Hubert Kario on 2015-08-12 09:42:35 EDT ---

This feature is necessary for interoperability between GnuTLS and NSS with TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 ciphersuite and DSA client certificates in TLSv1.2.

--- Additional comment from Hubert Kario on 2015-09-15 13:25:33 EDT ---

This issue breaks communication with Microsoft Internet Explorer clients that have certificates signed with algorithms different than SHA-256.

Since the server asks only for SHA256 signatures, the client refuses to provide its certificate and aborts the connection.

This is the expected behaviour according to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246#section-7.4.4

Comment 30 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-21 10:25:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0671.html