Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12334 (features/shard: Dump private members and addresses in statedump) posted (#1) for review on master by Krutika Dhananjay (kdhananj)
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12334/
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12340 (features/shard: Return ENOTSUP as opposed to ENOTCONN in unimplemented fops) posted (#1) for review on master by Krutika Dhananjay (kdhananj)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12334 (features/shard: Dump private members and addresses in statedump) posted (#2) for review on master by Krutika Dhananjay (kdhananj)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12340 (features/shard: Return ENOTSUP as opposed to ENOTCONN in unimplemented fops) posted (#2) for review on master by Krutika Dhananjay (kdhananj)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12334 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit aa71df19383ac15306374ea4992dd59e20f5a9c5 Author: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Date: Mon Oct 12 13:12:46 2015 +0530 features/shard: Dump private members and addresses in statedump Change-Id: I3c5e5bd93288c4c9a2665a26c0d6a76e67ecf914 BUG: 1270694 Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12334 Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12340 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit 041d31e90b6000643e8c06a6d82520e3f2cc3b9a Author: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Date: Wed Jul 29 14:27:07 2015 +0530 features/shard: Return ENOTSUP as opposed to ENOTCONN in unimplemented fops Change-Id: Idba1070b11c5c1de26ef57e6843c93c105b8b8a5 BUG: 1270694 Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12340 Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user