Bug 1272191 - grouped resources converted to separate resources
Summary: grouped resources converted to separate resources
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: clufter
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Tomas Jelinek
QA Contact: cluster-qe@redhat.com
Depends On: 1206640
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2015-10-15 17:25 UTC by Miroslav Lisik
Modified: 2020-12-15 07:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1206640
Last Closed: 2020-12-15 07:37:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
cluster.conf with service configuration (786 bytes, text/plain)
2015-10-15 17:25 UTC, Miroslav Lisik
no flags Details

Description Miroslav Lisik 2015-10-15 17:25:29 UTC
Created attachment 1083315 [details]
cluster.conf with service configuration

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1206640 +++

Description of problem:
Resources from service groups get converted to separate resources, causing undesired behavior (resources started on different nodes).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. cluster.conf with service group containing multiple resources
2. convert with clufter and deploy to pacemaker cluster
3. resources get started on different nodes

Actual results:
separate resources started on different nodes

Expected results:
grouped resources, running on the same node

Additional info:
The issue is caused by an attribute of service element which is 'exclusive="1"'. Look at the bug 1206640, comment 2.
Find attached configuration file with tested service group. If service is not set as 'exclusive' then resources are converted into one resource group, so they running on the same node.

Comment 2 Miroslav Lisik 2017-02-02 11:19:11 UTC
This bug can be closed because conversion of service element which has attribute 'exclusive="1"' is not supported.

Comment 3 Jan Pokorný [poki] 2017-05-30 16:07:33 UTC
It may be per [comment 2] at the end of the day, but I'd like to dedicate
a bit of time for proper analysis, hence bumping to 7.5 at this point.

Comment 4 Jan Pokorný [poki] 2017-11-07 15:54:42 UTC
Capacity asks for postponing for 7.6 consideration.

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2020-12-15 07:37:51 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.