Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1273226

Summary: Live migration fails when the instance has a config_drive_format=iso9660
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Stephen Gordon <sgordon>
Component: openstack-novaAssignee: Michal Pryc <mpryc>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Mike Abrams <mabrams>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)CC: akarlsso, awaugama, berrange, dasmith, eglynn, jschluet, kchamart, mabrams, mlopes, mpryc, mschuppe, myllynen, pneedle, sbauza, sferdjao, sgordon, srevivo, tshefi, vromanso
Target Milestone: asyncKeywords: Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: 9.0 (Mitaka)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-nova-13.1.2-1.el7ost.src.rpm Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-08 17:45:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1281573    

Description Stephen Gordon 2015-10-20 01:20:15 UTC 
Description of problem:

This error has occurred under the following situations.

・ Live migration of volume backed instance which has a config-drive
・ Block migration of instance which has a config-drive

we have to create a config-drive on destination host in pre-live-migration.
Comment 2 Stephen Gordon 2015-11-06 15:17:54 UTC 
NB: When using VFAT for the configuration drive this issue should not exist.
Comment 3 Eoghan Glynn 2015-12-11 11:18:45 UTC 
@steveg: would simply using VFAT instead be a sufficient workaround in this case?
Comment 4 Stephen Gordon 2016-01-12 22:26:55 UTC 
(In reply to Eoghan Glynn from comment #3)
> @steveg: would simply using VFAT instead be a sufficient workaround in this
> case?

When I queried the relevant partner on this the answer was no. They had a specific reason they needed to use iso9660.
Comment 18 Tzach Shefi 2017-01-22 10:28:35 UTC 
Removed Depends on flag on 1412661,  
was marked by mistake.
Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-08 17:45:06 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0467.html