Bug 1273505
| Summary: | irqbalance service is re-enabled during a package update. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Madhup Srivastawa <msrivast> |
| Component: | irqbalance | Assignee: | Petr Holasek <pholasek> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Andrej Manduch <amanduch> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.5 | CC: | akarande, andy.williams, dhoward, emcnabb, james.antill, jeder, pholasek, rrajaram, sauchter |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | irqbalance-1.0.7-6.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
Post-install script doesn't distinguish between new package install and package update.
Consequence:
If package was disabled in initscripts, it would be enabled after package update anyway.
Fix:
Post-install script doesn't change initscript settings while just updating.
Result:
Disabled irqbalance service won't be re-enabled after package update.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-05-10 20:10:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Madhup Srivastawa
2015-10-20 15:18:36 UTC
Hi Petr, why do you believe that this should be handled by yum? IMHO the problem is in the irqbalance postinstall script postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /sbin/chkconfig --add irqbalance If you would be doing this action only on install (and not also for update) it won't be happening, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Syntax Btw, if the customer would be doing chkconfig irqbalance off instead of chkconfig --del irqbalance it won't be enabled again after a package update. Hi Karel, The customer already tried this out and mentioned in his initial case description that even executing 'chkconfig --del irqbalance', does not do any good. Before writing this note I validated it myself too. regards, madhup (In reply to Madhup Srivastawa from comment #7) > Hi Karel, > > The customer already tried this out and mentioned in his initial case > description that even executing 'chkconfig --del irqbalance', does not do > any good. Before writing this note I validated it myself too. > > regards, > madhup I am speaking about "chkconfig irqbalance off" which seem to work properly according to my testing. Hi Petr, I have shared the test package with the cu and asked him to try it out. sfdc case status :- Waiting on Cu. Will update here as soon as I get news. regards, madhup Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0776.html |