Bug 1278744 - ec-readdir.t is failing consistently
ec-readdir.t is failing consistently
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: disperse (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Pranith Kumar K
Depends On: 1276989
Blocks: 1278539 glusterfs-3.7.7 1280410
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2015-11-06 05:47 EST by Pranith Kumar K
Modified: 2016-04-19 03:47 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.7.7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1276989
: 1280410 (view as bug list)
Last Closed: 2016-04-19 03:47:28 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Pranith Kumar K 2015-11-06 05:47:18 EST
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1276989 +++

Description of problem:
if we run ec-readdir.t in a loop it fails. This only happens on mainline not on 3.7. So some regression is the reason. For now moving to bad-tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-01 21:35:01 EST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12481 (tests: Move ec-readdir.t to bad tests) posted (#1) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu@redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-02 06:43:16 EST ---

COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12481 committed in master by Raghavendra Talur (rtalur@redhat.com) 
commit 56ccc0d2f4a30af9304852effbf2b68694d9f587
Author: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 2 07:56:51 2015 +0530

    tests: Move ec-readdir.t to bad tests
    Change-Id: Ie7f6d25cbc617ff347aeb7d77fc0a60924c83f09
    BUG: 1276989
    Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12481
    Tested-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-11 08:48:30 EST
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12562 committed in release-3.7 by Xavier Hernandez (xhernandez@datalab.es) 
commit 06b888bbeac61aa1234b43e398431529988c28b6
Author: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Nov 10 09:06:54 2015 +0530

    cluster/ec: fix bug in update_good
            Backport of http://review.gluster.com/12561
    Bricks that didn't participate in the fops are considered to be good. This is
    happening two fold.
    1) 2+1 volume. 'd1' directory on Brick-0 is bad.
    2) readdir takes locks and lock->good_mask is '7'
    3) readdir does xattrop and fop->mask is '6'.
    4) because fop->expected is '1' lock->good_mask remains '7'
    1) when all the bricks are up, it does lock + xattrop before op and figures out
       all the bricks are good.
    2) By the time second operation starts brick-0 is down. Now lock->good_mask
       will always have the '0' bit set as long as the operations are happening on it.
       because: "lock->good_mask &= ~fop->mask | fop->remaining" fop->mask doesn't
       have '0' th bit.
    3) When it comes time to perform the final xattrop in update_size_version
       brick-0 comes online because of which it gives the same version to brick-0
       as well thinking it has participated in all the transactions till then, even
       when it didn't participate in the transactions.
    Case-1's fix: Update lock->good_mask in ec_prepare_update_cbk with latest
    good/bad bricks
    Case-2's fix: Consider non-participating brick as bad.
    BUG: 1278744
    Change-Id: I5c2b07005107f3c067bac69da3b37ff39688bd69
    Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12562
    Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
    Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
    Reviewed-by: Xavier Hernandez <xhernandez@datalab.es>
Comment 2 Raghavendra Talur 2016-03-10 02:42:38 EST
"tests" component is for tests framework only.
File a bug under test component if you find a bug in 
1. any of the *.rc files under tests/ 
2. run-tests.sh

For everything else, the bug should be filed on
1. component which is being tested by .t file if the .t file requires fix.
2. component which is causing a valid .t file to fail in regression.

I have used my best judgement here to move the bug to right component.
In case of ambiguity, I have placed the blame on the .t file component.

Please consider test bugs under the same backlog list that tracks other bugs in your component.
Comment 3 Kaushal 2016-04-19 03:47:28 EDT
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.7, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.7 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-February/025292.html
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.