Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1278893 - Cannot view more than 20 hosts associated with an activation key
Summary: Cannot view more than 20 hosts associated with an activation key
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Management
Version: 6.1.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Walden Raines
QA Contact: Adam Ruzicka
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1317008
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-06 16:51 UTC by Stuart Auchterlonie
Modified: 2020-01-17 15:35 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-katello-3.0.0.26-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 11:35:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 14337 0 None None None 2016-04-26 16:57:13 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 2137241 0 None None None 2016-01-24 22:27:13 UTC

Description Stuart Auchterlonie 2015-11-06 16:51:42 UTC
Description of problem:

If you try to review the hosts associated with an activation
key, you can only view 20 hosts, not the full number associated
with that key.

The listing of consumed entitlements is correct.
ie. 40 out of unlimited
when looking at the listing of activation keys (Content > Activation Keys)

But when you view the activation key, then navigate to
Associations > Content Hosts, only 20 hosts are listed, with no way
of navigating to the remaining hosts.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Subscribe more than 20 hosts to satellite via an activation key
2. Navigate to Content > Activation Keys.
3. Select the activation key with more than 20 consumed entitlements
4. Navigate to Association > Content Hosts tab

Actual results:

Only 20 hosts are shown, with no way of navigating to the others

Expected results:

Some way of navigating to hosts other than the first 20

Additional info:

Comment 3 Walden Raines 2016-03-23 21:00:07 UTC
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14337 from this bug

Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2016-03-23 22:03:43 UTC
Upstream bug component is Content Management

Comment 5 Walden Raines 2016-03-23 23:39:14 UTC
PR - https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5913

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2016-04-05 18:03:48 UTC
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14337 has been closed
-------------
Walden Raines
Applied in changeset commit:katello|9aa09d8bc905f4b000bf2e261be646079edbe8eb.

Comment 7 Adam Ruzicka 2016-06-28 09:58:49 UTC
VERIFIED.
Satellite 6.2 GA 17.0
katello-3.0.0-8.el7sat.noarch

Followed instructions from comment #0, at first 20 hosts are shown, more are loaded on-demand when one scrolls to the bottom of the table.

Comment 8 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-27 11:35:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.