Bug 1281948 - Review Request: rack - RackSpace Cloud CLI tool
Summary: Review Request: rack - RackSpace Cloud CLI tool
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-13 21:43 UTC by Steven Soulen
Modified: 2020-07-21 18:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-17 02:27:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
steven: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steven Soulen 2015-11-13 21:43:30 UTC
Spec URL: http://ntp.soulen.net/rack.spec
SRPM URL: http://ntp.soulen.net/rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm
Description: The Rackspace Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage Rackspace Cloud services. It provides streamlined and secure configuration as well as a single point of entry for all Rackspace Cloud services.

Fedora Account System Username:soulen

*Please note this is my first package submission and I need a sponsor.

Koji Links:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11824327
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11824336
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11824391

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:32:16 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440921

Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:35:11 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440949

Comment 3 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:36:33 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440953

Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:38:13 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440957

Comment 5 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:43:30 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440963

Comment 6 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-06 22:53:22 UTC
soulen's scratch build of rack-1.0.1-0.src.rpm for epel7 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12440986

Comment 7 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-01-20 21:23:25 UTC
Remove "The" from the Summary, it looks better in listings without.

Why is debug package disabled? There should at least be a comment
in the spec file explaining the reason.

%description should be reflowed to 72 columns, and expanded a bit
to describe what the package actually does. It also has too many
buzzwords.

%setup -qn %{name}-%{version} → %autosetup
(-n %{name}-%{version} is the default, no need to specify it)

%{_builddir} should not be necessary. %build is executed in the unpackaged source directory, so only relative paths should be necessary.

%clean section is not needed [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean].

%license should be used for the LICENSE file [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text].

Comment 8 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:54:02 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.