Bug 1281991 - Review Request: qt4-style-fusion - Fusion widget style for Qt4
Summary: Review Request: qt4-style-fusion - Fusion widget style for Qt4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-14 00:50 UTC by Sandro Mani
Modified: 2015-12-30 17:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-22 22:03:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
rdieter: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sandro Mani 2015-11-14 00:50:54 UTC
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/fusion-qt4.spec
SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/fusion-qt4-hg20151112-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Fusion widget style for Qt4
Fedora Account System Username: smani

Note: qstylehelper.cpp is taken from the Qt4 sources, but since Qt4 won't receive any updates anymore, this shouldn't be an issue really.

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2015-12-14 16:21:54 UTC
I can review this.

Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2015-12-14 16:35:21 UTC
1. Naming: ok, but SHOULD follow practice of some other styles using something like:
qt4-style-fusion

2.  Version/Release: SHOULD: I'd also prefer you used something closer to recommendations on 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning
like:
Version: 0
Release: 1.hg20151112
(or some better Version: if you have a better idea)

3.  Sources: not ok.   MUST: sources not verifiable, please give url or script/directions on how to create reproduciable sources

4. macros, mostly ok, except for SHOULD replace
%make_install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
with
make install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}

5.  Since this package is using qt4-devel-private, SHOULD consider adding a hard versioned dep like:
%{?_qt4_version:Requires: qt4%{?_isa} = %{_qt4_version}}
though probably not important anymore, there's little chance of any new qt4 releases at this point.

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2015-12-14 17:23:12 UTC
Looks good, thanks.   APPROVED

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-12-14 17:59:26 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/qt4-style-fusion

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2015-12-14 19:21:00 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1fb6219c44

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2015-12-14 19:21:01 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-45ea4be3ce

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2015-12-15 10:52:34 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update qt4-style-fusion'
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1fb6219c44

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2015-12-22 15:36:30 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-45ea4be3ce

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2015-12-22 22:03:50 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2015-12-30 17:50:21 UTC
qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.