RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem: Code required to rebuild python-cryptography-0.8.2-1.el7.src.rpm missing

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):python-cryptography-0.8.2-1.el7.src.rpm


How reproducible:100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1.attempt to rebuild from RHEL7 sources
2.
3.

Actual results:
No Package found for python-cryptography-vectors = 0.8.2

Expected results:
build dependencies within release.

Additional info:

Thank you for submitting this report. However, RHEL PM decided that python-cryptography-vectors will not be added to RHEL base repositories at the moment. (Note that there is no requirement for RHEL to be self-hosting.)

I therefore have to close this bug as WONTFIX. The reasoning is the same as with other bugs you opened - Bug 1199507, Bug 1199508, Bug 1199546.

What we could do is to provide the SRPM and RPMs in other way. You can either take the RPMs from Fedora or we can publish the (S)RPMs on a fedorapeople.org place or a COPR repo.