Bug 1287743 - -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld breaks -static
Summary: -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld breaks -static
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1343892
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: redhat-rpm-config
Version: 23
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Florian Festi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1202091 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1192183
Blocks: harden-failure 1202091
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-12-02 15:09 UTC by Kamil Dudka
Modified: 2019-12-02 07:21 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-08 10:50:14 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1343892 0 unspecified CLOSED Default hardened ld flags break autoconf/libtool detection of -static flag with gcc 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1343892

Description Kamil Dudka 2015-12-02 15:09:32 UTC
Description of problem:
With -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld in LDFLAGS it is no longer possible to statically link the C run-time.  I see no way to work around this breakage, except removing -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld from LDFLAGS.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.noarch


Steps to Reproduce:
$ printf 'int main() { }\n' | gcc -xc - -static
$ printf 'int main() { }\n' | gcc -xc - -static -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/5.1.1/../../../../lib64/libc.a(libc-start.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `_dl_starting_up' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/5.1.1/../../../../lib64/libc.a: error adding symbols: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Comment 1 Kamil Dudka 2016-02-12 09:03:51 UTC
No reply for two months.  Is this package still actively maintained?

Comment 2 Panu Matilainen 2016-11-08 10:50:14 UTC
Marking as duplicate of bug 1343892 which has more information and a possible fix.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1343892 ***

Comment 3 Richard W.M. Jones 2016-11-24 11:55:01 UTC
*** Bug 1202091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.