Bug 1289280 - Don't have ability to add a new chargeback rate
Summary: Don't have ability to add a new chargeback rate
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.5.2
Assignee: Milan Zázrivec
QA Contact: Taras Lehinevych
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1284014
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-12-07 19:57 UTC by Chris Pelland
Modified: 2016-02-10 15:25 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.5.2.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1284014
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-10 15:25:08 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0159 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CFME 5.5.2 bug fixes and enhancement update 2016-02-10 20:19:02 UTC

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2015-12-11 17:21:58 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.5.z:
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=facef2a11311b1c91ecf429407a9331ccd376656

commit facef2a11311b1c91ecf429407a9331ccd376656
Author:     Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec>
AuthorDate: Thu Nov 26 11:46:21 2015 +0100
Commit:     Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec>
CommitDate: Wed Dec 9 11:21:56 2015 +0100

    Chargeback rates: correctly render tree nodes with no cb rates
    
    Chargeback rates tree builder needs to be able to create / render
    storage and compute tree nodes even when there are no chargeback
    rates available in the database.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289280
    (cherry picked from commit 636466c24964f844cb6fb375897e278d77b54db3)

 app/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_assignments.rb  |  3 +--
 app/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_rates.rb        |  3 +--
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_assignments.rb | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_rates_spec.rb  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_spec.rb                   | 11 ++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_assignments.rb
 create mode 100644 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_rates_spec.rb

Comment 3 CFME Bot 2015-12-11 17:22:07 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.5.z:
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=44752fbef69e0631f82e12455b1690c28aafcf37

commit 44752fbef69e0631f82e12455b1690c28aafcf37
Merge: 9fe810c facef2a
Author:     Dan Clarizio <dclarizi>
AuthorDate: Fri Dec 11 12:18:26 2015 -0500
Commit:     Dan Clarizio <dclarizi>
CommitDate: Fri Dec 11 12:18:26 2015 -0500

    Merge branch 'fix_chargeback_rates_tree_builder_when_zero_rates' into '5.5.z'
    
    Chargeback rates: correctly render tree nodes with no cb rates
    
    Chargeback rates tree builder needs to be able to create / render
    storage and compute tree nodes even when there are no chargeback
    rates available in the database.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289280
    
    Clean cherry pick from commit 636466c24964f844cb6fb375897e278d77b54db3
    
    See merge request !598

 app/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_assignments.rb  |  3 +--
 app/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_rates.rb        |  3 +--
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_assignments.rb | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_chargeback_rates_spec.rb  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 spec/presenters/tree_builder_spec.rb                   | 11 ++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comment 5 Taras Lehinevych 2016-01-18 15:17:24 UTC
Verified fixed in version 5.5.2.1

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-10 15:25:08 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:0159


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.