Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.3.2-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: BookKeeper is a replicated log service which can be used to build replicated state machines. A log contains a sequence of events which can be applied to a state machine. BookKeeper guarantees that each replica state machine will see all the same entries, in the same order. Fedora Account System Username: gil
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12378740
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bookkeeper See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 22 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/vagrant/1289604-bookkeeper/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven- poms/bookkeeper(bookkeeper-java), /usr/share/java/bookkeeper (bookkeeper-java) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Maven: [!]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider , bookkeeper-hedwig-client , bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms , bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol , bookkeeper-hedwig-server , bookkeeper-parent , bookkeeper-server , bookkeeper-stats-api , bookkeeper-stats-providers , bookkeeper-javadoc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Java: [x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) [x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-hedwig-client-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-hedwig-server-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-parent-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-server-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-stats-api-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-stats-providers-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-javadoc-4.3.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm bookkeeper-4.3.2-1.fc24.src.rpm bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-client.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-server.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-parent.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-server.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bookkeeper-server.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-stats-providers.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper.src:299: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package libhedwig %{_libdir}/libhedwig*.so.* bookkeeper.src:305: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package libhedwig-devel %{_libdir}/libhedwig*.so bookkeeper.src:306: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package libhedwig-devel %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/hedwig-*.pc 11 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-server.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bookkeeper-server.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-client.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-parent.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-stats-providers.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms.noarch: W: no-documentation bookkeeper-hedwig-server.noarch: W: no-documentation 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Requires -------- bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.codahale.metrics:metrics-core) mvn(com.codahale.metrics:metrics-graphite) mvn(com.codahale.metrics:metrics-jvm) mvn(com.google.guava:guava) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:bookkeeper-stats-api) bookkeeper-stats-api (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(commons-configuration:commons-configuration) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12) bookkeeper-server (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.google.guava:guava) mvn(com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java) mvn(commons-cli:commons-cli) mvn(commons-codec:commons-codec) mvn(commons-collections:commons-collections) mvn(commons-configuration:commons-configuration) mvn(commons-io:commons-io) mvn(io.netty:netty:3) mvn(log4j:log4j:1.2.17) mvn(net.java.dev.jna:jna) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:bookkeeper-stats-api) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:codahale-metrics-provider) mvn(org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12) bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12) bookkeeper-hedwig-client (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.google.guava:guava) mvn(commons-configuration:commons-configuration) mvn(io.netty:netty:3) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-protocol) mvn(org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api) bookkeeper-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): jpackage-utils bookkeeper-parent (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin) mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin) mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin) mvn(org.apache:apache:pom:) bookkeeper-stats-providers (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper:pom:) bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-protocol) mvn(org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jms_1.1_spec) bookkeeper-hedwig-server (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(jline:jline) mvn(log4j:log4j:1.2.17) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client) mvn(org.apache.derby:derby) mvn(org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api) mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12) Provides -------- bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider: bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:codahale-metrics-provider) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:codahale-metrics-provider:pom:) bookkeeper-stats-api: bookkeeper-stats-api mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:bookkeeper-stats-api) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:bookkeeper-stats-api:pom:) bookkeeper-server: bookkeeper-server mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server:pom:) bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol: bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-protocol) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-protocol:pom:) bookkeeper-hedwig-client: bookkeeper-hedwig-client mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client:pom:) bookkeeper-javadoc: bookkeeper-javadoc bookkeeper-parent: bookkeeper-parent mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper:pom:) bookkeeper-stats-providers: bookkeeper-stats-providers mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-stats-providers:pom:) bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms: bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client-jms) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-client-jms:pom:) bookkeeper-hedwig-server: bookkeeper-hedwig-server mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-server) mvn(org.apache.bookkeeper:hedwig-server:pom:) Source checksums ---------------- http://www.apache.org/dist/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.3.2/bookkeeper-4.3.2-src.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4fd8a42680735c024f44e0f1a5a11da7ff9f6314915058e35afd64c25cf807f6 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4fd8a42680735c024f44e0f1a5a11da7ff9f6314915058e35afd64c25cf807f6 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1289604 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Issues ====== [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven- poms/bookkeeper(bookkeeper-java), /usr/share/java/bookkeeper (bookkeeper-java) [!]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. AFAICT the tests aren't run in the build section? NON blocking issues =================== - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bookkeeper See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names It looks like you're reviving the dead package so this is fine. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. commentary on what the patches are for would be nice. it appears its because Fedora has newer versions of guava and jline? Following files don't have any copyright: bookkeeper-4.3.2/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/proto/BookkeeperProtocol.java bookkeeper-4.3.2/hedwig-client-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/hedwig/jms/message/header/JmsHeader.java Is it necessary to have all of the subpackages that just have one or two files in them?
(In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3) > Issues > ====== > > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven- > poms/bookkeeper(bookkeeper-java), /usr/share/java/bookkeeper > (bookkeeper-java) these directories should be handled (owner) by javapackages-tools during the install. if i add %dir /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper{,-java} i introduce duplicated files in this package > [!]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even > when building with ant handled by javapackages-tools > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. > > AFAICT the tests aren't run in the build section? maven build style do not required %check section > NON blocking issues > =================== > - Package does not use a name that already exists. > Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bookkeeper > See: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ > NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names > > It looks like you're reviving the dead package so this is fine. i want re-import this package, was retired because of log4cxx retirements > [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise > justified. > > commentary on what the patches are for would be nice. it appears its because > Fedora has newer versions of guava and jline? yes, i thought it was obvious, but if you prefer i can add comments > Following files don't have any copyright: > bookkeeper-4.3.2/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/proto/ > BookkeeperProtocol.java > bookkeeper-4.3.2/hedwig-client-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/hedwig/jms/ > message/header/JmsHeader.java these files are re-generated during the build > Is it necessary to have all of the subpackages that just have one or two > files in them? It is a normal practice.
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4) > (In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3) > > > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. > > > > AFAICT the tests aren't run in the build section? > > maven build style do not required %check section as i wrote in the comment in the header of the spec file: "Unsupported surefire plugin configuration", the JVM crash running test suite
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4) > (In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3) > > Issues > > ====== > > > > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven- > > poms/bookkeeper(bookkeeper-java), /usr/share/java/bookkeeper > > (bookkeeper-java) > > these directories should be handled (owner) by javapackages-tools during > the install. if i add %dir /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper{,-java} > i introduce duplicated files in this package you should run: fedora-review -b 1289604 --plugins Java -m fedora-rawhide-i386 , to avoid this problem, the file files.dir, generated, report these entries: bookkeeper-codahale-metrics-provider ==================================== /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-hedwig-client ======================== /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-hedwig-client-jms ============================ /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol ========================== /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/licenses/bookkeeper-hedwig-protocol /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-hedwig-server ======================== /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-parent ================= /usr/share/licenses/bookkeeper-parent /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-server ================= /usr/lib/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-stats-api ==================== /usr/share/doc/bookkeeper-stats-api /usr/share/java/bookkeeper /usr/share/licenses/bookkeeper-stats-api /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-stats-providers ========================== /usr/share/maven-poms/bookkeeper bookkeeper-javadoc ================== /usr/share/javadoc/bookkeeper
Created attachment 1110979 [details] files.dir
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.3.2-1.fc23.src.rpm - added comments about patches
any new news?
Gil, Sorry for the delay in replying, it looks good to me.
Thanks for the review!
Please, can you switch the Status flag to ASSIGNED? Thanks in advance
Open https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6325 to unlock the package