+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1285989 +++ Description of problem: if user execute bitrot scrub status command then it should display correct value of total number of scrubbed file, total number of unsigned file, and last scrub time. --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-27 02:22:00 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#1) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-27 10:57:21 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#2) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-03 22:45:33 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#4) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-04 04:43:14 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#5) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-09 04:15:15 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#6) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-09 04:46:28 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#7) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-09 06:38:21 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#8) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-10 02:18:31 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#9) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-10 03:45:07 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12776 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#10) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-12-14 22:08:43 EST --- COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12776 committed in master by Venky Shankar (vshankar) ------ commit 22827d51c232c44a8f5ac003529d907d93baf7b0 Author: Gaurav Kumar Garg <garg.gaurav52> Date: Wed Nov 25 17:38:43 2015 +0530 bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's When user execute bitrot scrub status command then gluster is not giving correct value of Number of Scrubbed files, Number of Unsigned files, Last completed scrub time, Duration of last scrub. With this patch scrub status will give correct value for all the above fields. Change-Id: Ic966f76d22db5b0c889e6386a1c2219afbda1f49 BUG: 1285989 Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar Garg <ggarg> Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12776 Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12966 (bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's) posted (#1) for review on release-3.7 by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12966 committed in release-3.7 by Venky Shankar (vshankar) ------ commit 530533fe44f08f30d1230c65db0054be7c6d3281 Author: Gaurav Kumar Garg <garg.gaurav52> Date: Wed Nov 25 17:38:43 2015 +0530 bitrot: getting correct value of scrub stat's This patch is backport of: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12776/ When user execute bitrot scrub status command then gluster is not giving correct value of Number of Scrubbed files, Number of Unsigned files, Last completed scrub time, Duration of last scrub. With this patch scrub status will give correct value for all the above fields. >> Change-Id: Ic966f76d22db5b0c889e6386a1c2219afbda1f49 >> BUG: 1285989 >> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar Garg <ggarg> >> Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat> >> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12776 >> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> >> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> >> Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar> Change-Id: Ic966f76d22db5b0c889e6386a1c2219afbda1f49 BUG: 1291546 Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar Garg <ggarg> (cherry picked from commit 22827d51c232c44a8f5ac003529d907d93baf7b0) Change-Id: Icef24cce35c8d54ffdfa5282491338318e78780b Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12966 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13223 (glusterd/cli: mask out inaccurate scrub statistics) posted (#1) for review on release-3.7 by Venky Shankar (vshankar)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13223 (glusterd/cli: mask out inaccurate scrub statistics) posted (#2) for review on release-3.7 by Venky Shankar (vshankar)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13223 committed in release-3.7 by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj) ------ commit 1643209297664462ffabc04a4fe667f2fb9be741 Author: Venky Shankar <vshankar> Date: Tue Dec 29 10:54:55 2015 +0530 glusterd/cli: mask out inaccurate scrub statistics Backport of http://review.gluster.org/13105 Some of the scrub statistics are inaccurate at the moment and would successfully fool users at times. It's best to not display these stats and stick to what is accurate. Note that the change is only in the CLI part - glusterd (and brick) supplies _all_ available scrub statistics, but CLI just selectively sticks to what needs to be displayed. Change-Id: Ia99f505a2cb10d5406cd37035d082e593f7e9a8c BUG: 1291546 Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13223 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.7, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.7.7 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-February/025292.html [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user