+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1291560 +++ Description of problem: =========================== On a tiered volume, with 2x2 cold tier and 2x3 dis-rep hot tier was performing renames|deletes on files/dirs. When the bricks went offline, the renames/deletes failed with "No such file or directory". The bricks from cold tier were all online as quorum was set. Only one of the bricks from the each sub-volume of the hot-tier went offline. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): =============================================================== glusterfs 3.7.5 built on Dec 3 2015 11:30:45 How reproducible: ==================== Often Steps to Reproduce: ====================== 1. Create 2x2 dis-rep cold-tier and 2x3 dis-rep hot-tier volume. Start the volume. Mount the volume. 2. From mount, create files/dirs. 3. rename few of the files/dirs created to different name 4. While rename is in progress, crash the mounts of the bricks using "godown" utility.(available in xfsprogs). Actual results: ================ On mount, the rename fails with "No such file or directory" Expected results: ==================== Renames/deletes shouldn't fail Additional info: =================== Volume Name: testvol Type: Tier Volume ID: 5a2f042d-ee04-4b3d-b5d5-d36e29cea325 Status: Started Number of Bricks: 10 Transport-type: tcp Hot Tier : Hot Tier Type : Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x 3 = 6 Brick1: rhsauto020.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick2/testvol_tier5 Brick2: rhsauto017.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick2/testvol_tier4 Brick3: rhsauto038.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick1/testvol_tier3 Brick4: rhsauto021.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick1/testvol_tier2 Brick5: rhsauto020.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick1/testvol_tier1 Brick6: rhsauto017.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick1/testvol_tier0 Cold Tier: Cold Tier Type : Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Brick7: rhsauto017.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick0/testvol_brick0 Brick8: rhsauto020.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick0/testvol_brick1 Brick9: rhsauto021.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick0/testvol_brick2 Brick10: rhsauto038.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com:/bricks/brick0/testvol_brick3 Options Reconfigured: diagnostics.brick-log-level: DEBUG diagnostics.client-log-level: DEBUG performance.readdir-ahead: on features.ctr-enabled: on cluster.tier-mode: cache cluster.watermark-low: 75 cluster.watermark-hi: 90 Error messages seen in client log: ================================= [2015-12-14 07:45:12.156546] E [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:251:client3_3_mknod_cbk] 0-testvol-client-9: remote operation failed. Path: (null) [Input/output error] [2015-12-14 07:45:12.159452] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:664:client3_3_unlink_cbk] 0-testvol-client-0: remote operation failed [Device or resource busy] [2015-12-14 07:45:12.159480] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:664:client3_3_unlink_cbk] 0-testvol-client-1: remote operation failed [Device or resource busy] [2015-12-14 07:45:12.160293] I [MSGID: 109069] [dht-common.c:1159:dht_lookup_unlink_stale_linkto_cbk] 0-testvol-tier-dht: Returned with op_ret -1 and op_errno 16 for /E_file_44
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12973 (cluster/afr: During name heal, propagate EIO only on gfid or type mismatch) posted (#1) for review on master by Krutika Dhananjay (kdhananj)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/12973 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit 7ba6469eee3118cc4ece905d2538ef778320ae63 Author: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Date: Tue Dec 15 18:48:20 2015 +0530 cluster/afr: During name heal, propagate EIO only on gfid or type mismatch When the disk associated with a brick returns EIO during lookup, chances are that name heal would return an EIO because one of the syncop_XXX() operations as part of it returned an EIO. This is inherently treated by afr_lookup_selfheal_wrap() as a split-brain and the lookup is aborted prematurely with EIO even if it succeeded on the other replica(s). Change-Id: Ib9b7f2974bff8e206897bb4f689f0482264c61e5 BUG: 1291701 Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12973 Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user