Hide Forgot
Description of problem: In GUI or Text mode install, RH ES 2.1-U4, receiving errors when package isntallation begins. Anaconda gives the dump below, while the text mode install gives a signal 11. Memory has been tested including several different modules and all memory works fine. Machine is a Dell Poweredge 750, 2.8GHz, failed with 256, 512, and 756meg of memory. Tested using all default options (including not setting time zone, medium firewall, etc) Doing the same installation with RH ES 3-U2 works flawlessly. (I require 2.1 for this server, otherwise I would be using 3) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100% for me. May be problem with this server, although seems odd that ES3 would install and run fine. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Choose graphical or text install 2. Choose any options, including leaving everything at default settings 3. Receive unhandled exception with the included dump Actual results: Fails with dump to save to floppy Expected results: Hoping it would complete the installation and work Additional info: See dumpfile
Created attachment 102473 [details] Anaconda dump file from failed install
Created attachment 102476 [details] second anaconda dump
I remembered I had originally gotten this (similar) error at the very end of the installation. The only (that I remember) difference between what was described above and this is that I made my normal package selection (choose from list rather than the default). This error occurs *after* all selected packages have been copied and appears to die on the grub configuration. Attached is the dumpfile for this error.
These look like possible bad CDs. Could you try reburning your CDs at a lower speed and see if the problem persists?
Alrighty, multiple pieces to add: Original Cd's (burned at 16x) loaded a different machine just fine *UNTIL* reboot. After choosing the kernel, I got this error: invalid compressed format (err=1) and the system halted. Ok, fine, I try your option, reburn the cd's, this time at 8x. Then reinstalled, went through, chose all the various packages, ready to go, copied all gig worth of data up to and including 2-3 packages on CD 3, at which point I got the original error again. =\ Any other suggestions or ideas where to look?
It's definitely sounding like the CDs. I'd suggest burning at a low speed (2-4x) as there's some minor dislike between your CD drive and the CD-R's you're using.
Made a set of CD's at 2x on a different machine (all cds prior had been made on the same machine) and installed. I did get through the install all the way to rebooting. Now I have problems that that appear to relate to the filesystem type, but I am unsure why: When installing, I get 2 kernels, the normal and an smp, with the smp being default. When booting to smp, it runs through various things up to the point it hits RAMDISK. It gives the following error (manual transcription) Invalid compressed format (err=2)Freeing initrd memory: 421k freed request_module[block-major-8]: root fs not mounted VFS: Cannot open root device "sda2" or 08:02 Please append correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:02 if I choose the non-smp kernel, it stops immediately: root(hd0,0) Filesystem tpye is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 Kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.9-e.40 ro root=/dev/sda2 Error 13: Invalid or unsopported executable format Press any key to continue At this point, pressing any key takes me back to kernel selection. The odd this is that it seems to think this partition is ext2, when it is in fact ext3, presumably what is causing the corruption error, but *why* it think it is ext2 instead of ext3 I guess would be the important question now. We use a MegaRaid 150-4 SATA Raid Controller configured to mirror 2-40gb drives in this particular server, if it helps get us pointed in the right direction. Thanks
Turned out to not be CD's - The default megaraid2 driver is 1.18 which amazingly enough semi-works with the 150-4 card. There is a 2.10.?? built into update 4 of 2.1, and doing an expert noprobe install allows me to choose that new version instead of the default one. Sorry to waste time here heading in the wrong direction. Thanks for the time.