Bug 1293042 - [virtio-win][vioser] Extra '-' (dash) in serial driver name
Summary: [virtio-win][vioser] Extra '-' (dash) in serial driver name
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virtio-win
Version: 7.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ladi Prosek
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2015-12-19 15:26 UTC by Ladi Prosek
Modified: 2016-11-04 08:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 08:49:36 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2609 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virtio-win bug fix and enhancement update 2016-11-03 15:27:12 UTC

Description Ladi Prosek 2015-12-19 15:26:48 UTC
Description of problem:
The name of the serial driver is not consistent with the rest of virtio-win.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install drivers
2. Open Device Manager, look at device names

Actual results:
VirtIO-Serial Driver

Expected results:
VirtIO Serial Driver

Additional info:

Comment 3 Yu Wang 2016-03-23 08:02:42 UTC
Reproduced this issue on virtio-win-prewhql-112 version
Verified this issue on virtio-win-prewhql-115 version
Steps same as comment#0

Actual Results:

on virtio-win-prewhql-112 (un-fixed version), the issue can be reproduced as comment#0
on virtio-win-prewhql-115 (fix version), Open Device Manager,device names is "VirtIO Serial Driver"
Base on above, this issue has been fixed already.


Comment 4 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 22:57:02 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune@redhat.com with any questions

Comment 5 Ladi Prosek 2016-05-23 08:58:30 UTC
Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!

Comment 6 Yu Wang 2016-05-23 09:37:45 UTC
(In reply to Ladi Prosek from comment #5)
> Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!

Verify this bug according comment#3


Comment 7 Yu Wang 2016-05-23 09:39:33 UTC
(In reply to Ladi Prosek from comment #5)
> Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!


I have verified this bug, but there is no "devel_ack" for this bug.


Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 08:49:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.