sscep-0.6.1-1.20151228git68e354a not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, $RPM_LD_FLAGS, nor %smp_mflags. Fix: diff --git a/sscep.spec b/sscep.spec index 45c68aa..d589f07 100644 --- a/sscep.spec +++ b/sscep.spec @@ -20,4 +20,3 @@ Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support & more %build -#make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" -make +%make_build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LDFLAGS="$RPM_LD_FLAGS"
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase
Ping?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '24'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Thorsten: ping? Issue is still present in sscep-0.6.1-4.20160525git2052ee1.fc26. Is this package being maintained?
What is the problem with your build? It works for me: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=862952
(In reply to Thorsten Scherf from comment #5) > What is the problem with your build? It's not "my" build, it's the Fedora official build. It does not use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or $RPM_LD_FLAGS, please see the initial comment and the fix. > It works for me: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=862952 For some value of "works". It shows that the needed compiler and linker flags are not being used, from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/sscep/0.6.1/4.20160525git2052ee1.fc26/data/logs/x86_64/build.log: gcc -Wall -O -I /usr/lib64//include -c -o sscep.o sscep.c This gcc invocation should include things like "-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong" etc.
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #6) > (In reply to Thorsten Scherf from comment #5) > > What is the problem with your build? > > It's not "my" build, it's the Fedora official build. It does not use > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or $RPM_LD_FLAGS, please see the initial comment and the fix. > > > It works for me: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=862952 > > For some value of "works". It shows that the needed compiler and linker > flags are not being used, from > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/sscep/0.6.1/4. > 20160525git2052ee1.fc26/data/logs/x86_64/build.log: > > gcc -Wall -O -I /usr/lib64//include -c -o sscep.o sscep.c > > This gcc invocation should include things like "-Werror=format-security > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong" etc. Ah. Good catch. Thanks for the heads-up. I will build a new package shortly.
Here is the build for master: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20763670 I will take care about other branches once the build for all arches was successful.
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a5fc805283
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-b50572c103
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-b50572c103
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-56b8f257af
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a5fc805283
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
sscep-0.6.1-5.20160525git2052ee1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.