RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:


"ruserok(3)": "man-pages" package need to update to fill out the sentence:

~~~
    If  this file does not exist, is not a regular file, is owned by
    anyone other than the user or the superuser, or is writable  by
    anyone  other than the owner, the check automatically fails.
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Above statement is missing from man page of "ruserok(3)"

As the description says, this change has to be applied to the man-pages package.

(In reply to Mukesh Thapa from comment #0)
> Above statement is missing from man page of "ruserok(3)"
Actually the statement is not missing, but it's incomplete. The ruserok() function fails also if the .rhosts file is hardlinked anywhere.

Patch was sent and accepted upstream:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg09868.html

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0940.html