Bug 129589 – [PATCH] openssl spec file doesn't understand armv5te(b) architectures

Bug 129589 - [PATCH] openssl spec file doesn't understand armv5te(b) architectures

Summary:	[PATCH] openssl spec file doesn't understand armv5te(b) architectures

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	openssl (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	xscale Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomas Mraz
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	EasyFix, Patch

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-08-10 13:29 EDT by Lennert Buytenhek
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-05-06 11:29:14 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Suggested fix. (512 bytes, patch) 2004-08-10 13:31 EDT, Lennert Buytenhek	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-10 13:30:00 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510

Description of problem:
The openssl spec file doesn't know about the armv5te(b) architectures.
 This causes it to attempt to build the package as linux-elf on such
architectures, which then tries to assemble an x86 assembler file
using the ARM assembler, etc.

Fortunately, openssl itself does understand ARM.  Make the spec file
use sslarch linux-elf-arm, and all is well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.9.7a-35

How reproducible:
Always

Comment 1 Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-10 13:31:21 EDT

Created attachment 102585 [details]
Suggested fix.

Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2005-05-06 11:29:14 EDT

Not a supported architecture.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.