Bug 1297435 (CVE-2015-8396) - CVE-2015-8396 gdcm: Buffer overflow in ImageRegionReader::ReadIntoBuffer
Summary: CVE-2015-8396 gdcm: Buffer overflow in ImageRegionReader::ReadIntoBuffer
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: CVE-2015-8396
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1297436
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-11 14:10 UTC by Adam Mariš
Modified: 2021-02-17 04:31 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gdcm 2.6.2
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-02 09:21:46 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Mariš 2016-01-11 14:10:06 UTC
It was found that GDCM versions 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 (and possibly previous versions) are prone to an integer overflow vulnerability which leads to a buffer overflow and potentially to remote code execution. The vulnerability is triggered by the exposed function gdcm::ImageRegionReader::ReadIntoBuffer, which copies DICOM image data to a buffer. ReadIntoBuffer checks whether the supplied buffer is large enough to hold the necessary data, however in this check it fails to detect the occurrence of an integer overflow, which leads to a buffer overflow later on in the code. The buffer overflow will occur regardless of the size of the buffer supplied to the ReadIntoBuffer call.

External reference:

http://census-labs.com/news/2016/01/11/gdcm-buffer-overflow-imageregionreaderreadintobuffer/

Comment 1 Adam Mariš 2016-01-11 14:10:45 UTC
Created gdcm tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1297436]

Comment 2 Sebastian Pölsterl 2016-01-13 19:19:00 UTC
AFAICT, this affects the 2.6 series. GDCM in rawhide has been updated to 2.6.2, which includes the fix, already. The remaining Fedora versions only include gdcm-2.4.x, which are not affected?

Comment 3 Adam Mariš 2016-01-14 09:39:37 UTC
(In reply to Sebastian Pölsterl from comment #2)
> AFAICT, this affects the 2.6 series. GDCM in rawhide has been updated to
> 2.6.2, which includes the fix, already. The remaining Fedora versions only
> include gdcm-2.4.x, which are not affected?

Could you please explain why do you think so? The source code in 2.4.5 looks pretty much the same for given vulnerable functions.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.