Bug 1299210 - No initial-setup on Fedora Rawhide 20160115 (qemu-kvm)
Summary: No initial-setup on Fedora Rawhide 20160115 (qemu-kvm)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: initial-setup
Version: 24
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Martin Kolman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F24AlphaFreezeException
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-17 12:16 UTC by Giulio 'juliuxpigface'
Modified: 2016-03-07 18:30 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: anaconda-24.11-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-07 18:30:44 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Output of "journalctl" from the first boot (Xfce) (184.38 KB, text/plain)
2016-01-17 12:16 UTC, Giulio 'juliuxpigface'
no flags Details
Output of "systemctl status initial-setup.service" after the first boot (Xfce) (234 bytes, text/plain)
2016-01-17 12:17 UTC, Giulio 'juliuxpigface'
no flags Details
Output of "journalctl -u initial-setup.service" after the first boot (Xfce) (56 bytes, text/plain)
2016-01-17 12:19 UTC, Giulio 'juliuxpigface'
no flags Details
Screesnhot of 20160214's initial-setup (65.10 KB, image/png)
2016-02-16 20:46 UTC, Giulio 'juliuxpigface'
no flags Details

Description Giulio 'juliuxpigface' 2016-01-17 12:16:42 UTC
Created attachment 1115563 [details]
Output of "journalctl" from the first boot (Xfce)

Description of problem:
initial-setup isn't automatically started after the installation of Fedora Rawhide. I've encountered this issue with both Xfce and Lxde spin on qemu-kvm. I'll try KDE as soon as possible.

It's a different issue from #1250409 and #1250409 where, apparently because of some racy conditions, the graphical one wasn't always displayed (but in that cases, at least the textual one popped up).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
initial-setup-0.3.38-1.fc24.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot Fedora 24 Rawhide on a new qemu-kvm guest.
2. Install Fedora without adding an user account with Anaconda.
3. Reboot after installation.

Actual results:
initial-setup doesn't pop up.

Expected results:
initial-setup should start (at least the CLI interface).

Additional info:
I'm attaching some logs as attachments.

Comment 1 Giulio 'juliuxpigface' 2016-01-17 12:17:57 UTC
Created attachment 1115564 [details]
Output of "systemctl status initial-setup.service" after the first boot (Xfce)

Comment 2 Giulio 'juliuxpigface' 2016-01-17 12:19:00 UTC
Created attachment 1115565 [details]
Output of "journalctl -u initial-setup.service" after the first boot (Xfce)

Comment 3 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 2016-02-02 21:10:06 UTC
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 24-alpha by Fedora user juliuxpigface using the blocker tracking app because:

 the criterion "2.4.1 Expected installed system boot behavior" isn't fully violated here. The mechanism inside Anaconda works as expected, so we are able to create an user account during the installation.

However, since creating an account with Anaconda isn't mandatory, the boot behavior might confuse our users if we don't provide them the usual first boot utility.

At least on qemu-kvm, the initial-setup utility seems to be absent nor broken with every Desktop Spin (Workstation is the exception here, since gnome-initial-setup seems to be a different tool).

Please note that I'm unable to test what happens on bare metal. If this bug is only related to qemu-kvm, the severity doesn't IMHO justify a FE.

Comment 4 Giulio 'juliuxpigface' 2016-02-16 20:46:11 UTC
Created attachment 1127722 [details]
Screesnhot of 20160214's initial-setup

Thank you. I can confirm that the primary issue seems fixed. initial-setup starts successfully on 20160214's image.

However, the layout is totally broken; I'm attaching a screenshot. Do you think it's better to open a new report? I don't think the new issue is related to this...

Comment 5 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:33:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 6 Kamil Páral 2016-03-07 18:30:44 UTC
Discussed at today's blocker review meeting [1]. I'm closing this issue, because it has been fixed and verified. Giulio, please report the remaining issues separately, and nominate them as blockers or freeze exceptions if appropriate. Thank you.

[1] https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-03-07/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.