Bug 1299441 - (CVE-2016-0483) CVE-2016-0483 OpenJDK: incorrect boundary check in JPEG decoder (AWT, 8139017)
CVE-2016-0483 OpenJDK: incorrect boundary check in JPEG decoder (AWT, 8139017)
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
urgent Severity urgent
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=critical,public=20160119,repor...
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks: 1295699
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-01-18 06:49 EST by Tomas Hoger
Modified: 2016-07-18 09:56 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the JPEG image format decoder in the AWT component in OpenJDK. A specially crafted JPEG image could cause a Java application to crash or, possibly execute arbitrary code. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-02 10:20:47 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tomas Hoger 2016-01-18 06:49:48 EST
It was discovered that the JPEG decoder in the AWT component of OpenJDK did not use correct buffer boundary in certain cases when decoding JPEG files.  A specially crafted JPEG file could cause a Java application to corrupt its memory and possibly execute arbitrary code when opened.  An untrusted Java application or applet could also use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions.
Comment 1 Tomas Hoger 2016-01-19 16:51:45 EST
Public now via Oracle Critical Patch Update - January 2016.  Fixed in Oracle Java SE 6u111, 7u95, and 8u71.

External References:

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html#AppendixJAVA
Comment 2 Tomas Hoger 2016-01-20 08:55:42 EST
OpenJDK 8 upstream commit:

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/43325651ebb8
Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-20 14:15:45 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2016:0050 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0050.html
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-20 14:34:39 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0049 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0049.html
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-21 06:23:37 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0057 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0057.html
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-21 06:40:20 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0056 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0056.html
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-21 06:41:47 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Oracle Java for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0055 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0055.html
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-21 06:43:18 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2016:0053 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0053.html
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-21 06:59:16 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2016:0054 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0054.html
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-01-26 08:12:46 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0067 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0067.html
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-02 05:06:01 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2016:0101 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0101.html
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-02 05:07:33 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2016:0100 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0100.html
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-02 08:40:17 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2016:0098 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0098.html
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-02 08:54:12 EST
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2016:0099 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0099.html
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-18 09:56:52 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Satellite 5.6
  Red Hat Satellite 5.7

Via RHSA-2016:1430 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1430

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.