Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fuse/perl-Fuse.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fuse/perl-Fuse-0.16.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: This lets you implement filesystems in perl, through the FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace) kernel/lib interface. Fedora Account System Username: jplesnik
jplesnik's scratch build of perl-Fuse-0.16.1-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12634416
* Missing a buildtime dependency used in the SPEC: make * You should also depend on pkgconfig(fuse), preferrably replacing fuse-devel. * Missing some buildtime deps needed for testing. - blib, via test/s/mount.t and examples/loopback.pl - IO::File, via examples/loopback.pl * Consider packaging the Lchown distribution. * Package the examples directory as documentation. * threads and threads::shared appear to be optional dependencies. This module will (most likely) work fine without them. Maybe only `recommend' them? * According to the metadata, the license tag should be simply `LGPLv2'. However, the README file says this project is distributed under the same terms as FUSE itself, which appears to be GPLv2: https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/blob/master/COPYING Please, ask upstream what they really mean. * Protip: Call chmod with -c.
Updated Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fuse/perl-Fuse.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fuse/perl-Fuse-0.16.1-2.fc24.src.rpm I asked upstream about the license, but I don't get any answer yet.
+# LGPLv2+: Reference from metadata +# (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+): same license as fuse as mention in README +License: LGPLv2+ and (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+) Eh, well, I guess this could be it until upstream responds to rt#111618. Just drop the first `+' and the trailing whitespace on the first comment line. The rest was addressed, too. Approving.
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Fuse
Thank you for the review and the repository.