Description of problem: It looks like dnf makecache timer that is eanbled by default for some reason cannot understand that it's running on a readonly root system (i.e. nfsroot) and fires anyway, so 10 minutes after system start we end up with dnf makecache process that hogs 100% of cpu. 32441 ? RNs 14:24 /usr/bin/python -OO /usr/bin/dnf -v makecache timer strace shows that it's looping trying to perform: open("/var/cache/dnf/metadata_lock.pid", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0644) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) open("/var/cache/dnf/metadata_lock.pid", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The file does not exist: # ls -la /var/cache/dnf/metadata_lock.pid ls: cannot access /var/cache/dnf/metadata_lock.pid: No such file or directory The /var/cache/dnf is not one of the default targets to be mounted in tmpfs (and for a good reason). I see that the timer in question already contains a condition against running when started from livecd image: ConditionKernelCommandLine=!rd.live.image Now, if this could be replaced with a check of /etc/sysconfig/readonly-root and not run when READONLY is set to yes - that would be a lot more proper solution. Or at least a check that /var/cache/dnf is actually writeable. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): present in all version of dnf starting from FC21 How reproducible: 100% reproducible Steps to Reproduce: If you are not up to the task of doing nfs readonly-root install or the like, you can simulate it by: 1. mount none /var/cache/dnf -t tmpfs 2. mount / /media --bind 3. cp -a /media/var/cache/dnf/* /var/cache/dnf/ 4. umount /media 5. strace dnf makecache Note it's important to do the copying of a real existing dnf cache as otherwise it's smart enough to fail seeing as it cannot create it if the /var/cache/dnf is empty (which it is not on a real readonly nfsroot install) Actual results: dnf enters infinite loop hogging 100% of one cpu. Expected results: should notice that it cannot do anything. Even better if dnf makecache was not run by default in such a case. Additional info: This all got introduced with the mandatory on-by-default dnf makecache timer as part of dnf package, that sparked quite a heated discussion in bug 1187111.
There's one more step in the reproducer, btw, that I forgot to include: 3.5 mount /var/cache/dnf -o remount,ro Otherwise the /var/cache/dnf is not readonly and you won't see the problem.
we can add the readonly checker everytime we load cache directory.
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.