Description of problem: When one creates a repo, there is no word about what algorithm used for calculating the checksum values for repository metadata for RHEL7 machines. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): >> rpm -qa "*rhui*" rh-amazon-rhui-client-rhs30-2.2.124-1.el7.noarch rhui-installer-base-0.0.24-1.el7ui.noarch rh-rhui-tools-libs-pre.3.0.16-1.el7ui.noarch rhui-installer-0.0.24-1.el7ui.noarch rh-rhui-tools-pre.3.0.16-1.el7ui.noarch rhui-default-ca-1.0-1.noarch rh-amazon-rhui-client-2.2.118-1.el7.noarch RHUI iso 20151013 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: From home screen: 1 'r' - manage repositories 2. 'c' - create a new custom repository (RPM content only) >> Unique ID for the custom repository (alphanumerics, _, and - only): test_repo >> Display name for the custom repository [test_repo]: [ENTER] Path at which the repository will be served [test_repo]: [ENTER] Algorithm to use when calculating the checksum values for repository metadata: * Select "sha256" for RHEL6: * Select "sha1" for either RHEL5 or RHEL6: 1 - sha256 2 - sha1 Enter value (1-2) or 'b' to abort: Actual results: * Select "sha256" for RHEL6: * Select "sha1" for either RHEL5 or RHEL6: Expected results: maybe change it into "If you create repo for RHEL5 use sha1, otherwise the default option is sha256" 1 - sha256 (default) 2 - sha1
RHEL6 and 7 ISO's 20161025: Algorithm to use when calculating the checksum values for repository metadata: 1 - sha256 (default) 2 - sha1 (RHEL 5) Enter value (1-2) or 'b' to abort: >> pulp-admin -u admin -p admin repo list --details +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ Repositories +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ Id: unprotected_repo1 Display Name: unprotected_repo1 Description: unprotected_repo1 Content Unit Counts: Notes: Checksumtype: sha256 ..... Id: unprotected_repo2_sha1 Display Name: unprotected_repo2_sha1 Description: unprotected_repo2_sha1 Content Unit Counts: Notes: Checksumtype: sha1
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0367