Bug 1303651 - update to selinux-policy-mls package to include recent database related refpolicy changes
Summary: update to selinux-policy-mls package to include recent database related refpo...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 7.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Lukas Vrabec
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-01 15:08 UTC by Adam Brightwell
Modified: 2019-09-12 09:52 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-75.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 02:41:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2283 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2016-11-03 13:36:25 UTC

Description Adam Brightwell 2016-02-01 15:08:51 UTC 
Description of problem:

The current selinux refpolicy packaged with RHEL 7.2 (including all
other previous versions) does not contain necessary configurations to
allow proper usage of the MLS policy with database related objects and
operations.  These changes have been recently merged into the SELinux
refpolicy.


https://github.com/TresysTechnology/refpolicy/commit/b68d45324b23794a1b9cb3046ae8ce74c737d12d

I would like to request the back patching of these changes to be
included with the official RedHat RPM distribution for
selinux-mls-policy package.


How reproducible:

N/A

Steps to Reproduce:

N/A

Actual results:

Database objects cannot have a range of levels.

Expected results:

Database object allowed to have a range of levels.  As defined by the changes made to the refpolicy.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 02:41:33 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2283.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.