Bug 130602 - sgml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat not owned by docbook-dtds
Summary: sgml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat not owned by docbook-dtds
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 193475
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: docbook-dtds
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ondrej Vasik
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-08-22 16:52 UTC by W. Michael Petullo
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-21 07:57:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description W. Michael Petullo 2004-08-22 16:52:54 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
Gecko/20040809 Epiphany/1.3.5

Description of problem:
Thought the docbook-dtds package owns the symbolic links
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook.cat and /etc/sgml/xml-docbook.cat, it does not
own the target of those links.  The files
/etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat and
/etc/sgml/xml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat are not owned by any package.  At
the least, these should be %ghost'ed by docbook-dtds.

As a result of this, /etc/sgml retains out of date files following the
upgrade of the docbook-dtds package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
docbook-dtds-1.0-24

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qf /etc/sgml/xml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat

Actual Results:  file /etc/sgml/xml-docbook-4.2-1.0-24.cat is not
owned by any package

Expected Results:  The file should be owned by a package.

Additional info:

Comment 1 W. Michael Petullo 2004-08-22 16:53:33 UTC
The /etc/sgml/catalog file should also probably be %ghost'ed.

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2004-08-23 11:29:53 UTC
This is quite fragile -- we don't want these things to be removed
after package upgrade (i.e. after the new package's %post has run).

Comment 3 Ondrej Vasik 2007-05-21 07:57:44 UTC
Closed as DUPLICATE, because in #193475 is nearly same ticket(same issue) for
newer version with suggested solution patch(although this one is disputed by Tim). 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193475 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.