(In reply to Roman Mohr from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> When pinning virtual NUMA nodes to physical numa node with memory allocation
> policy 'STRICT', we create the required virtual numa nodes and we pin the
> virtual numa node CPUs to the correct physical NUMA nodes, but we do not
> create the correct memory mapping.
> 
> We produce something like 
> 
> >  <numatune>
> >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> >  </numatune>

prior to RHEL 7 this was the configuration we could use AFAIR. 

Roman what is the runtime effect of this configuration? is it really different?

> 
> instead of
> 
> >  <numatune>
> >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> >    <memnode cellid="0" mode="strict" nodeset="0"/>
> >    <memnode cellid="1" mode="strict" nodeset="1"/>
> >  </numatune>
> 
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> 
> 
> How reproducible:
> 
> 
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Create a VM with two numa nodes (0, 1)
> 2. Pin the numa nodes to two different host numa nodes (0,1)
> 3. Start the VM
> 4. run virsh -r dumpxml <vmname>
> 
> Actual results:
> 
> Virtual NUMA node cpus are pinned but memory is not pinned
> 
> Expected results:
> 
> Both should be pinned
> 
> Additional info:
> 
> Full example with two virtual NUMA nodes which are pinned with the strict
> policy to two physical NUMA nodes:
> 
> > <domain type='kvm' id='3'>
> > [...]
> >  <cputune>
> >    <shares>1020</shares>
> >    <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='1'/>
> >    <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='0'/>
> >  </cputune>
> >  <numatune>
> >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> >  </numatune>
> >  <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
> >    <model fallback='allow'>SandyBridge</model>
> >    <topology sockets='16' cores='1' threads='1'/>
> >    <numa>
> >      <cell id='0' cpus='0' memory='3072' unit='KiB'/>
> >      <cell id='1' cpus='1' memory='3072' unit='KiB'/>
> >    </numa>
> >  </cpu>
> > [...]
> > </domain>

(In reply to Roy Golan from comment #1)
> (In reply to Roman Mohr from comment #0)
> > Description of problem:
> > 
> > When pinning virtual NUMA nodes to physical numa node with memory allocation
> > policy 'STRICT', we create the required virtual numa nodes and we pin the
> > virtual numa node CPUs to the correct physical NUMA nodes, but we do not
> > create the correct memory mapping.
> > 
> > We produce something like 
> > 
> > >  <numatune>
> > >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> > >  </numatune>
> 
> prior to RHEL 7 this was the configuration we could use AFAIR. 
> 
> Roman what is the runtime effect of this configuration? is it really
> different?
> 

At least on PPC it is some kind of ignored. Will add some more data for x86.

@Martin could you share your PPC findings?

> > 
> > instead of
> > 
> > >  <numatune>
> > >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> > >    <memnode cellid="0" mode="strict" nodeset="0"/>
> > >    <memnode cellid="1" mode="strict" nodeset="1"/>
> > >  </numatune>
> > 
> > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> > 
> > 
> > How reproducible:
> > 
> > 
> > Steps to Reproduce:
> > 1. Create a VM with two numa nodes (0, 1)
> > 2. Pin the numa nodes to two different host numa nodes (0,1)
> > 3. Start the VM
> > 4. run virsh -r dumpxml <vmname>
> > 
> > Actual results:
> > 
> > Virtual NUMA node cpus are pinned but memory is not pinned
> > 
> > Expected results:
> > 
> > Both should be pinned
> > 
> > Additional info:
> > 
> > Full example with two virtual NUMA nodes which are pinned with the strict
> > policy to two physical NUMA nodes:
> > 
> > > <domain type='kvm' id='3'>
> > > [...]
> > >  <cputune>
> > >    <shares>1020</shares>
> > >    <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='1'/>
> > >    <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='0'/>
> > >  </cputune>
> > >  <numatune>
> > >    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
> > >  </numatune>
> > >  <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
> > >    <model fallback='allow'>SandyBridge</model>
> > >    <topology sockets='16' cores='1' threads='1'/>
> > >    <numa>
> > >      <cell id='0' cpus='0' memory='3072' unit='KiB'/>
> > >      <cell id='1' cpus='1' memory='3072' unit='KiB'/>
> > >    </numa>
> > >  </cpu>
> > > [...]
> > > </domain>

I have created a VM with 4 NUMA vcells pinned to pcell 0.

Resulting XML looked as follows:

<cpu>
        <model>POWER8</model>
        <topology cores="2" sockets="2" threads="2"/>
        <numa>
                <cell cpus="0,1" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="2,3" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="4,5" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="6,7" memory="2621440"/>
        </numa>
</cpu>
<numatune>
        <memory mode="strict" nodeset="0"/>
</numatune>

but checking the memory maps of the vcpu pids unveils this information:

for vcpu_pid in /proc/1476{09..16}; do
    echo $vcpu_pid
    cat $vcpu_pid/numa_maps | cut -d \  -f2 | uniq
done

/proc/147609
prefer:16
/proc/147610
prefer:16
/proc/147611
prefer:16
/proc/147612
prefer:16
/proc/147613
prefer:16
/proc/147614
prefer:16
/proc/147615
prefer:16
/proc/147616
prefer:16

My conclussion is that, at least on PPC, the memory is not pinned at all and prefers node that was not at all chosen.

Testing with Cluster-on-Die PC (Xeon 2650-v3) with COD enabled (2 numa nodes, 0 and 1)

<cpu match="exact" mode="host-passthrough">
        <topology cores="2" sockets="16" threads="2"/>
        <numa>
                <cell cpus="0,1" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="2,3" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="4,5" memory="2621440"/>
                <cell cpus="6,7" memory="2621440"/>
        </numa>
</cpu>
<numatune>
        <memory mode="strict" nodeset="1"/>
</numatune>

---

/proc/28616
prefer:0
/proc/28617
prefer:1
/proc/28618
prefer:0
/proc/28619
prefer:1
/proc/28620
prefer:0
/proc/28621
prefer:1
/proc/28622
prefer:0
/proc/28623
prefer:0

The fix for this issue should be included in oVirt 4.1.0 beta 1 released on December 1st. If not included please move back to modified.

Verified on ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-4.1.0-0.2.master.20161212172238.gitea103bd.el7.centos.noarch

dumpxml for two NUMA nodes
<numatune>
    <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
    <memnode cellid='0' mode='strict' nodeset='0'/>
    <memnode cellid='1' mode='strict' nodeset='1'/>
  </numatune>


VM process also looks fine:
default
bind:1
default
bind:0
default
/proc/16941/task/16943
default
bind:1
default
bind:0
default
/proc/16941/task/16947
default
bind:1
default
bind:0
default
/proc/16941/task/16948
default
bind:1
default
bind:0
default
/proc/16941/task/16950
default
bind:1
default
bind:0
default