Bug 1307883 - ptpd-phc: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: ptpd-phc: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ptpd-phc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Josh Boyer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F24FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-13 22:03 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2016-02-16 16:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-16 16:16:17 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (6.80 KB, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:03 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (79.17 KB, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:03 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (705 bytes, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:03 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:52 UTC 
Your package ptpd-phc failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12857597

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:54 UTC 
Created attachment 1125710 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:55 UTC 
Created attachment 1125711 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:56 UTC 
Created attachment 1125712 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Josh Boyer 2016-02-15 21:20:21 UTC 
Miroslav,  as far as I understand the current state of PTP PHC support, this package is very outdated.  It was a one-off github repo Richard Cochran created around the time PHC support was added to the upstream kernel.  He never intended for it to be production code.  The github project has since been deleted.

I'd like to retire this package completely for Fedora, but I wanted to make sure that linuxptp was a suitable replacement.  Does that match your understanding?
Comment 5 Miroslav Lichvar 2016-02-16 08:16:59 UTC 
Yes, it does. If you need PTP with HW timestamping, linuxptp is the way to go.
Comment 6 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-16 16:14:46 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 7 Josh Boyer 2016-02-16 16:16:17 UTC 
Thanks for the quick response.  I've retired ptpd-phc in rawhide.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.