Bug 1308228 - vifm: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: vifm: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: vifm
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Boeckel
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F24FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-13 22:40 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2016-04-24 01:05 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-24 01:05:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (75.59 KB, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:40 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (84.18 KB, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:40 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (601 bytes, text/plain)
2016-02-13 22:40 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
Patch to address this issue (1.60 KB, patch)
2016-03-23 06:13 UTC, Ralf Corsepius 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:40:24 UTC 
Your package vifm failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12876872

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:40:26 UTC 
Created attachment 1126752 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:40:27 UTC 
Created attachment 1126753 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:40:28 UTC 
Created attachment 1126754 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:18:39 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase
Comment 5 Ralf Corsepius 2016-03-23 06:13:07 UTC 
Created attachment 1139337 [details]
Patch to address this issue

This FTBFS is caused by mixing direct installation of docs (make install) into %{_pkgdocdir} and installation of docs through "%doc <relative path>".

The patch in the attachment (against fedora git/master) contains how I would address this issue and a couple of further minor packaging issues.

Unless somebody objects, I intend to apply this patch in near future.
Comment 6 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-03-31 00:39:41 UTC 
mathstuf's vifm-0.8-3.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750045
Comment 7 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-04-24 01:04:14 UTC 
mathstuf's vifm-0.8.1a-1.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=757144
Comment 8 Ben Boeckel 2016-04-24 01:05:48 UTC 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13782994
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.